#110 boardBall-winning No. 6Age 22

Gibson Yah

Across 1,666 published minutes for FC Volendam in the 2025/26 Eredivisie, Gibson Yah profiles here as a ball-winning No. 6. The case rests on tackle output at 3.62 per 90 (90th percentile), duel win rate at 61.2% (91st percentile) and aerial-win output at 1.67 per 90 (73rd percentile). There is real activity at the base of midfield. Scanning, body position and the ability to defend a wider transition will determine the ceiling.

NetherlandsBristol City · reviewed 2026-08-26Championship1,666 senior minutes

Performance sample details

FC Volendam · Eredivisie · 2025/26. Current registration and the team behind the published statistics are shown separately.

Score as of: 2026-07-18
Identity updated: 2026-08-26
Performance sample: FC Volendam · Eredivisie · 2025/26

Leading signal 1

Tackles per 90

90th

Leading signal 2

Duel win rate

91st

Leading signal 3

Aerial wins

73rd

Context flag

No clear role-critical concern in the published sample

Video review remains essential.

Headline output

Current release window

Apps: 24
Starts: 20
Minutes: 1,666
Goals: 0
Assists: 3
G+A /90: 0.16

Visual analysis · 01

Performance fingerprint

The canonical five-axis role shape shows the published percentiles; peer bands add selected advanced values and reviewed role-cohort evidence.

Role profile

Five published, position-aware axes form the canonical role shape for this release. Each point is a direct percentile from the validated public player record.

Defensive MidfieldPartial evidence

Visual signatureDM

Published player profile50th percentile reference

Exact evidence

Published role-axis percentile

0–100

Tackles per 9090thpercentile
Interceptions per 9082ndpercentile
Duel win rate91stpercentile
Pass completion41stpercentile
Long-pass accuracy55thpercentile

These published axes describe statistical role shape. They are not Wonderkid Score weights, a talent grade, or a tactical-fit claim.

Peer bands

Current release-window values placed on a 0–100 reviewed role-cohort percentile band. Comparison: Source-specific role cohorts with comparable release-window coverage.

Duel win rate

61.2%

Percentile91st

Accurate long passes

2.32 /90

Percentile72nd

Dribble success

40.7%

Percentile17th

Tackles

3.62 /90

Percentile90th

Passes

45.86 /90

Percentile71st

Shots

0.59 /90

Percentile33rd

Duels won

7.24 /90

Percentile89th

Long passes

4.32 /90

Percentile68th

Markers show percentile position. Raw-value distribution shapes are withheld when reviewed cohort bins are unavailable.

Visual analysis · 02

Data-led scout read

Scout read

The quickest read on the role, the standout numbers and what still needs film.

Data-led

Role identity

Ball-winning No. 6

Defensive Midfield

Interception output at 1.67 per 90 marks another strength in the 82nd percentile. The No. 6 job lives between the recorded actions. Film has to test his scanning, cover shadow and response when midfield opens up.

Why he catches the eye

Duel win rate91
Tackles per 9090
Interceptions per 9082

What to test on film

The published measures do not flag one obvious statistical concern.

Percentile flags open questions; they do not close them. Video, role, opponent quality and tactical context remain essential.

Evidence status · data screen only

Automated data screen

Published metrics support the role and shortlist prompts shown in this release.

Video observation

This profile does not include a completed live or video scouting assessment.

Projection

No ceiling or tactical-fit grade is published without documented human observation.

Visual analysis · 03

Comparable role shapes

Nearby public percentile profiles provide a starting point for comparison, not a claim of equal quality or upside.

Similar public profiles

Profile-shape index is a capped 0–100 similarity index built from distance across the same complete published role dimensions with identical constituent metric sets. It is not a probability and does not claim equal ability, potential, or tactical fit. The mean profile-percentile gap compares the average of those matched dimensions.

Profile similarity

Close role shape

Jorthy Mokio

Ajax Amsterdam · Eredivisie

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #46
Score: 71.2
Age: 18

Shared high signal: Defensive activity

Mean profile-percentile gap: 4.2 mean percentile pts lower
Estimated value tier: €10–24m2 tiers higher than viewed player

Profile Compare

Related role shape

Aladji Bamba

Newcastle United · Premier League

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #229
Score: 61.8
Age: 20

Shared high signal: Duel strength

Mean profile-percentile gap: 0.4 mean percentile pts lower
Estimated value tier: €10–24m2 tiers higher than viewed player

Profile Compare

Related role shape

Ibrahima Sory Bangoura

KRC Genk · Belgian Pro League

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #100
Score: 67.3
Age: 22

Shared high signal: Defensive activity

Mean profile-percentile gap: 3.5 mean percentile pts lower
Estimated value tier: Under €5mSame tier as viewed player

Profile Compare

Visual analysis · 04

Development tracking

A transparent baseline now, with verified change over time only when comparable future releases exist.

Development baseline

One verified point is recorded. No trend is shown until a second comparable release exists.

Baseline only

Verified score

66.7

Senior minutes

1,666

Registered role

Why there is no trend yet

The next point appears only after another release passes the same model-definition, coverage-window and publication checks. Until then, this card records a baseline and makes no movement claim.

Deep evidence

Inspect the full record

Metric tables, market context, career records, coverage notes and interpretation guidance remain available without competing with the scouting conclusions above.

Full performance tableAdvanced metrics coverage · PartialAdvanced-metric coverage is partial with 22 reviewed percentiles; unavailable measures are omitted.

Advanced performance metrics

Current release-window rates and efficiency signals. Bars show the player's reviewed role-cohort percentile; the printed value remains the primary evidence.

Attacking & creation

8 measures

Shots on target

0.22 /90

—

percentile

Value verified · comparable percentile pending

Shots

0.59 /90

33rd

percentile

Shot accuracy

36.4%

—

percentile

Value verified · comparable percentile pending

Dribble attempts

1.46 /90

65th

percentile

Successful dribbles

0.59 /90

48th

percentile

Dribble success

40.7%

17th

percentile

Key passes

0.65 /90

51st

percentile

Fouls won

1.35 /90

67th

percentile

Possession & distribution

7 measures

Long-pass accuracy

53.8%

55th

percentile

Pass accuracy

82.6%

41st

percentile

Passes

45.86 /90

71st

percentile

Completed passes

37.87 /90

67th

percentile

Long passes

4.32 /90

68th

percentile

Accurate long passes

2.32 /90

72nd

percentile

Dispossessed per 90

0.81 /90

Lower is better · percentile shown favourably

47th

percentile

Defending & duels

9 measures

Aerial wins

1.67 /90

73rd

percentile

Clearances

3.19 /90

87th

percentile

Duel win rate

61.2%

91st

percentile

Interceptions

1.67 /90

82nd

percentile

Tackles

3.62 /90

90th

percentile

Defensive shot blocks

0.92 /90

—

percentile

Value verified · comparable percentile pending

Duels

11.83 /90

70th

percentile

Duels won

7.24 /90

89th

percentile

1v1 containment

0.70 /90

62nd

percentile

Discipline

1 measures

Fouls committed per 90

1.24 /90

Lower is better · percentile shown favourably

68th

percentile

Published performance sample: FC Volendam · Eredivisie · 2025/26. The club in the profile header is the separately reviewed current registration.

Metric glossary and provenance

Definitions, units and source lineage for the evidence published on this profile.

Inspect 25 published metric definitions

Published metric definitions, measurement units and data sources
Metric	Definition	Unit	Calculation	How to read it	Source
Shots on target	Shots on target by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Shots	Shots attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Shot accuracy	Share of attempted shots that were on target.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Dribble attempts	Dribbles attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Successful dribbles	Dribbles completed successfully, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Dribble success	Share of attempted dribbles completed successfully.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Key passes	Passes that directly create a shot, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Fouls won	Fouls drawn by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Long-pass accuracy	Share of attempted long passes that were completed.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Pass accuracy	Share of attempted passes that were completed.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Passes	Passes attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Completed passes	Passes completed by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Long passes	Long passes attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Accurate long passes	Completed long passes played by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Ball security	Times the player lost possession to an opponent challenge, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes · lower is better	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Lower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjusted	Not carried in public record
Aerial wins	Aerial duels won by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Clearances	Defensive clearances made by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Duel win rate	Share of contested duels won by the player.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Interceptions	Opponent passes intercepted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Tackles	Tackles made by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Defensive shot blocks	Shots or passes blocked by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Duels	Ground and aerial duels contested by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Duels won	Ground and aerial duels won by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
1v1 containment	Times an opponent completed a dribble past the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes · lower is better	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Lower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjusted	Not carried in public record
Discipline	Fouls committed by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes · lower is better	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Lower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjusted	Not carried in public record

Source seasonNot carried per metric

Release captured2026-07-18

Source data-throughNot carried per metric

Release captured identifies this public release; it does not claim that every upstream source was current through that date. Source names remain unavailable because they are not carried per metric in the public record. Percentiles describe position within the stated comparison context. Wonderkid Score inputs, weights and formula remain proprietary and are not disclosed here.

Market evidenceValuation history coverage · UnavailableValuation-history coverage is unavailable in this release. The separate model estimate remains available, but missing observations are not treated as zero.

Scout estimate

~€3m

Under €5m tier

Rounded Wonderkid Scout estimate · 2026-07-18

Likely-sale range

Not calibrated

Model-led only

Market evidence

No dated anchor

A range will appear only after player-specific evidence is reviewed.

This remains a model-led estimate informed by current football evidence and reviewed market comparables. No dated player-specific market or fee anchor is available in this release.

Valuation-history coverage is unavailable for this release. This does not mean the player had zero historical market observations.

Club-to-club transfer historyTransfer history coverage · ReadyTransfer-history coverage is ready with 7 reviewed records, newest first.

FC VolendamBristol City
2026-06-26 · Permanent · Fee not reported
Utrecht U21FC Volendam
2025-07-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported
Ajax U21Utrecht U21
2022-07-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported
Ajax U18Ajax U21
2021-07-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported
Ajax U17Ajax U18
2020-07-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported
Ajax YouthAjax U17
2019-07-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported
Buiksloot Yth.Ajax Youth
2014-07-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported

Source: salimt/football-datasets (Transfermarkt-derived).

Recorded moves may not form a complete career chain. The current club shown above is reviewed separately.

Recent senior involvementRecent matches coverage · PartialRecent-match coverage is partial with 10 reviewed appearances; unavailable match context is omitted.

vs SC Telstar

2026-05-17 · Eredivisie · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

81'

0G · 0A

vs Excelsior Rotterdam

2026-05-10 · Eredivisie · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs SC Heerenveen

2026-05-03 · Eredivisie · Substitute

Peer-level opponent sample

39'

0G · 0A

vs Heracles Almelo

2026-04-26 · Eredivisie · Started

Lighter opponent sample

82'

0G · 0A

vs FC Twente Enschede

2026-04-10 · Eredivisie · Started

Stronger opponent sample

45'

0G · 0A

vs Feyenoord Rotterdam

2026-04-05 · Eredivisie · Started

Stronger opponent sample

61'

0G · 0A

vs Sparta Rotterdam

2026-03-21 · Eredivisie · Substitute

Peer-level opponent sample

30'

0G · 0A

vs Fortuna Sittardia Combinatie

2026-03-14 · Eredivisie · Substitute

Lighter opponent sample

30'

0G · 0A

vs AZ Alkmaar

2026-01-10 · Eredivisie · Started

Stronger opponent sample

59'

0G · 0A

vs Sparta Rotterdam

2025-12-21 · Eredivisie · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

87'

0G · 0A

Profile context and privacyPublic identity fields, release dates and age-protection boundaries.

Position group: Midfielder
Position: DM

Ages are shown only in whole years. Exact birth dates are not published for any player. Under-18 profiles do not display portraits, physical details, or detailed history.

How to read this profileHigh-level onlyInterpretation guidance and limitations without publishing proprietary calculation weights.

Wonderkid Score

A position-aware discovery score informed by performance, age, playing time and competition context. It prioritizes search and comparison; it is not a career prediction.

Percentiles and scout prompts

Percentiles compare current published role evidence. Low involvement is not automatically a weakness; tactics, opponent quality, sample size and video context still matter.

Versioned release

This score is bound to release global-top-250-2026-07-18. A public “what moved” explanation will appear only after a second comparable score, minutes and role snapshot exists.

Youth age context

Verified private cohort windows can be retained as coarse validation bands. The current release does not apply a relative-age score correction. Exact birth dates are never published, and unavailable context is never inferred.

Detailed model weights, internal provider identifiers and raw source payloads are not part of the public profile. Unavailable athletic-tracking, off-ball, contract and event-location evidence is omitted rather than estimated.

Coverage gapsNot scoredImportant scouting dimensions reserved for verified evidence rather than inferred from conventional event totals.

Athletic tracking

Top speed, acceleration, repeat sprinting and contact tolerance require consistent tracking or testing data.

Off-ball intelligence

Movement, scanning, space creation and pressure behaviour require observed location data or reviewed video.

Scout projection

Ceiling, tactical fit and development priorities require a verified human scouting report and longitudinal evidence.

Spatial evidence

Action maps require verified player-linked event coordinates. Territory, off-ball movement and physical maps require tracking data and are never estimated from totals.

Evidence grade

How much reviewed public evidence supports this profile—not a talent grade.

Strong evidence

A strong reviewed sample across the available position benchmarks.

Senior sample: 1,666 min
Role measures: 5
Requested role coverage: 22 measuresPartial

Snapshot 2026-07-18. Grade presentation follows the reviewed evidence state already attached to the profile.