WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#74CB

Matte Smets

Age 22 · KRC Genk · Belgian Pro League

Open profile
69.4
#124CB

Sadibou Sané

Age 22 · AS Monaco · Ligue 1

Stats: FC Metz · Ligue 1 · 2025/26

Open profile
65.6

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Matte Smets69.4Matte Smets edgeSadibou Sané65.6
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Matte Smets3 edgesMatte Smets edgeSadibou Sané2 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Matte Smets3,510Matte Smets edgeSadibou Sané1,941
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CB

Matte Smets holds the broader CB edge

4 meaningful role-shape advantages to 3. The largest separation is Defensive activity.

7 shared dimensions
Defensive activity20 pt edge
6383
Aerial authority17 pt edge
4326
Ball security15 pt edge
9075
Long distribution12 pt edge
9583
Distribution11 pt edge
9483
Matte SmetsSadibou Sané
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Matte Smets and Sadibou Sané on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.PassingLong passingDuels wonTacklesinterception_volumeClearances
Matte SmetsSadibou Sané
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureMatte SmetsSadibou Sané
Wonderkid Score69.4065.60
Board rank#74#124
Age2222
Estimated transfer worth~€10m~€2m
Valuation tier€10–24mUnder €5m
Appearances3923
Starts3922
Senior minutes3,5101,941
Goals12
Assists11
PositionCentre-BackCentre-Back
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureMatte SmetsSadibou Sané
Passes74.97 /90 · 96th66.63 /90 · 88th
Pass accuracy91.4% · 90th89.4% · 75th
Long passes9.95 /90 · 95th7.56 /90 · 78th
Accurate long passes5.90 /90 · 98th4.13 /90 · 88th
Long-pass accuracy59.3% · 93rd54.6% · 82nd
Duels7.31 /90 · 33rd7.37 /90 · 34th
Duels won4.28 /90 · 38th4.45 /90 · 46th
Duel win rate58.6% · 57th60.4% · 70th
Aerial wins1.90 /90 · 43rd1.48 /90 · 26th
Interceptions1.44 /90 · 69th1.76 /90 · 85th
Clearances7.00 /90 · 87th5.98 /90 · 68th
Defensive shot blocks0.79 /90 · 55th1.11 /90 · 85th
1v1 containment0.33 /900.74 /90
Tackles1.79 /90 · 64th2.13 /90 · 78th
Discipline0.56 /90 · 88th1.02 /90 · 52nd
Completed passes68.54 /90 · 96th59.58 /90 · 87th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison