#124 boardHigh-completion two-way centre-backAge 22

Sadibou Sané

Across 1,941 published minutes for FC Metz in 2025/26 Ligue 1, Sadibou Sané's numbers fit a high-completion two-way centre-back. The three numbers to note are pass completion at 89.4% (75th percentile), interception output at 1.76 per 90 (85th percentile) and shot-blocking output at 1.11 per 90 (85th percentile). Aerial-win output sits in the 26th percentile, but team territory and role shape event volume. Film must establish the reason before treating it as a weakness.

SenegalAS Monaco · reviewed 2026-08-26Ligue 11,941 senior minutes

Performance sample details

FC Metz · Ligue 1 · 2025/26. Current registration and the team behind the published statistics are shown separately.

Score as of: 2026-07-18
Identity updated: 2026-08-26
Performance sample: FC Metz · Ligue 1 · 2025/26

Leading signal 1

Pass accuracy

75th

Leading signal 2

Interceptions per 90

85th

Leading signal 3

Defensive shot blocks

85th

Context flag

Aerial wins per 90

26th percentile · review with role and video context.

Headline output

Current release window

Apps: 23
Starts: 22
Minutes: 1,941
Goals: 2
Assists: 1
G+A /90: 0.14

Visual analysis · 01

Performance fingerprint

The canonical five-axis role shape shows the published percentiles; peer bands add selected advanced values and reviewed role-cohort evidence.

Role profile

Five published, position-aware axes form the canonical role shape for this release. Each point is a direct percentile from the validated public player record.

Centre-BackPartial evidence

Visual signatureCB

Published player profile50th percentile reference

Exact evidence

Published role-axis percentile

0–100

Interceptions per 9085thpercentile
Clearances per 9068thpercentile
Duel win rate70thpercentile
Aerial wins per 9026thpercentile
Long-pass accuracy82ndpercentile

These published axes describe statistical role shape. They are not Wonderkid Score weights, a talent grade, or a tactical-fit claim.

Peer bands

Current release-window values placed on a 0–100 reviewed role-cohort percentile band. Comparison: Source-specific role cohorts with comparable release-window coverage.

Defensive shot blocks

1.11 /90

Percentile85th

Accurate long passes

4.13 /90

Percentile88th

Interceptions

1.76 /90

Percentile85th

Passes

66.63 /90

Percentile88th

Tackles

2.13 /90

Percentile78th

Completed passes

59.58 /90

Percentile87th

Aerial wins

1.48 /90

Percentile26th

Long-pass accuracy

54.6%

Percentile82nd

Markers show percentile position. Raw-value distribution shapes are withheld when reviewed cohort bins are unavailable.

Visual analysis · 02

Data-led scout read

Scout read

The quickest read on the role, the standout numbers and what still needs film.

Data-led

Role identity

High-completion two-way centre-back

Centre-Back

Completed long-pass volume at 4.13 per 90 also stands out, ranking in the 88th percentile. The film priorities are line height, cover decisions and his first action when pressure arrives.

Why he catches the eye

Interceptions per 9085
Defensive shot blocks85
Accurate long passes88

What to test on film

Aerial wins per 9026

Percentile flags open questions; they do not close them. Video, role, opponent quality and tactical context remain essential.

Evidence status · data screen only

Automated data screen

Published metrics support the role and shortlist prompts shown in this release.

Video observation

This profile does not include a completed live or video scouting assessment.

Projection

No ceiling or tactical-fit grade is published without documented human observation.

Visual analysis · 03

Comparable role shapes

Nearby public percentile profiles provide a starting point for comparison, not a claim of equal quality or upside.

Similar public profiles

Profile-shape index is a capped 0–100 similarity index built from distance across the same complete published role dimensions with identical constituent metric sets. It is not a probability and does not claim equal ability, potential, or tactical fit. The mean profile-percentile gap compares the average of those matched dimensions.

Profile similarity

Close role shape

Marvin Young

Sparta Rotterdam · Eredivisie

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #56
Score: 70.3
Age: 20

Shared high signal: Long distribution

Mean profile-percentile gap: 5.9 mean percentile pts lower
Estimated value tier: €5–9m1 tier higher than viewed player

Profile Compare

Close role shape

Matte Smets

KRC Genk · Belgian Pro League

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #74
Score: 69.4
Age: 22

Shared high signal: Distribution

Mean profile-percentile gap: 2.8 mean percentile pts higher
Estimated value tier: €10–24m2 tiers higher than viewed player

Profile Compare

Related role shape

Jérémy Jacquet

Liverpool FC · Premier League

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #128
Score: 65.4
Age: 21

Shared high signal: Distribution

Mean profile-percentile gap: 6.0 mean percentile pts lower
Estimated value tier: €50–69m4 tiers higher than viewed player

Profile Compare

Visual analysis · 04

Development tracking

A transparent baseline now, with verified change over time only when comparable future releases exist.

Development baseline

One verified point is recorded. No trend is shown until a second comparable release exists.

Baseline only

Verified score

65.6

Senior minutes

1,941

Registered role

Why there is no trend yet

The next point appears only after another release passes the same model-definition, coverage-window and publication checks. Until then, this card records a baseline and makes no movement claim.

Deep evidence

Inspect the full record

Metric tables, market context, career records, coverage notes and interpretation guidance remain available without competing with the scouting conclusions above.

Full performance tableAdvanced metrics coverage · ReadyAdvanced-metric coverage is ready with 15 reviewed percentiles, rates and efficiency values.

Advanced performance metrics

Current release-window rates and efficiency signals. Bars show the player's reviewed role-cohort percentile; the printed value remains the primary evidence.

Possession & distribution

6 measures

Long-pass accuracy

54.6%

82nd

percentile

Pass accuracy

89.4%

75th

percentile

Passes

66.63 /90

88th

percentile

Completed passes

59.58 /90

87th

percentile

Long passes

7.56 /90

78th

percentile

Accurate long passes

4.13 /90

88th

percentile

Defending & duels

10 measures

Aerial wins

1.48 /90

26th

percentile

Clearances

5.98 /90

68th

percentile

Duel win rate

60.4%

70th

percentile

Errors leading to goal per 90

0.05 /90

Lower is better · percentile shown favourably

—

percentile

Value verified · comparable percentile pending

Interceptions

1.76 /90

85th

percentile

Tackles

2.13 /90

78th

percentile

Defensive shot blocks

1.11 /90

85th

percentile

Duels

7.37 /90

34th

percentile

Duels won

4.45 /90

46th

percentile

1v1 containment

0.74 /90

—

percentile

Value verified · comparable percentile pending

Discipline

1 measures

Fouls committed per 90

1.02 /90

Lower is better · percentile shown favourably

52nd

percentile

Published performance sample: FC Metz · Ligue 1 · 2025/26. The club in the profile header is the separately reviewed current registration.

Metric glossary and provenance

Definitions, units and source lineage for the evidence published on this profile.

Inspect 17 published metric definitions

Published metric definitions, measurement units and data sources
Metric	Definition	Unit	Calculation	How to read it	Source
Long-pass accuracy	Share of attempted long passes that were completed.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Pass accuracy	Share of attempted passes that were completed.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Passes	Passes attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Completed passes	Passes completed by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Long passes	Long passes attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Accurate long passes	Completed long passes played by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Aerial wins	Aerial duels won by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Clearances	Defensive clearances made by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Duel win rate	Share of contested duels won by the player.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Errors leading to goal	Provider-recorded errors leading to a goal, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes · lower is better	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Lower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjusted	Not carried in public record
Interceptions	Opponent passes intercepted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Tackles	Tackles made by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Defensive shot blocks	Shots or passes blocked by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Duels	Ground and aerial duels contested by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Duels won	Ground and aerial duels won by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
1v1 containment	Times an opponent completed a dribble past the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes · lower is better	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Lower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjusted	Not carried in public record
Discipline	Fouls committed by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes · lower is better	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Lower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjusted	Not carried in public record

Source seasonNot carried per metric

Release captured2026-07-18

Source data-throughNot carried per metric

Release captured identifies this public release; it does not claim that every upstream source was current through that date. Source names remain unavailable because they are not carried per metric in the public record. Percentiles describe position within the stated comparison context. Wonderkid Score inputs, weights and formula remain proprietary and are not disclosed here.

Market evidenceValuation history coverage · ReadyValuation-history coverage is ready with 3 reviewed historical observations, alongside the separate model estimate and likely-sale range.

Scout estimate

~€2m

Under €5m tier

Rounded Wonderkid Scout estimate · 2026-07-18

Likely-sale range

Not calibrated

Model-led only

Market evidence

No dated anchor

A range will appear only after player-specific evidence is reviewed.

The estimate is informed by dated player-specific market or fee evidence, reviewed comparables, and current football evidence. It is not a quoted fee or asking price.

Historical market observations

2023-09-11€800K last recorded point2024-06-03

Market reference universe: the reviewed Transfermarkt public U23 market-value table. Chart source: dcaribou/transfermarkt-datasets (CC0 1.0; Transfermarkt-derived). Historical observations are not current asking prices.

Club-to-club transfer historyTransfer history coverage · ReadyTransfer-history coverage is ready with 3 reviewed records, newest first.

FC MetzAS Monaco
2026-07-07 · Permanent · Fee not reported
Génération FootFC Metz
2023-07-22 · Permanent · Fee not reported
Diouloulou FCGénération Foot
2021-11-11 · Permanent · Fee not reported

Source: salimt/football-datasets (Transfermarkt-derived).

Recorded moves may not form a complete career chain. The current club shown above is reviewed separately.

Recent senior involvementRecent matches coverage · PartialRecent-match coverage is partial with 10 reviewed appearances; unavailable match context is omitted.

vs OGC Nice

2026-05-17 · Ligue 1 · Started

Lighter opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs FC Lorient

2026-05-10 · Ligue 1 · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs AS Monaco

2026-05-02 · Ligue 1 · Started

Stronger opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Le Havre AC

2026-04-26 · Ligue 1 · Started

Lighter opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Paris FC

2026-04-19 · Ligue 1 · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 1A

vs Olympique Marseille

2026-04-10 · Ligue 1 · Started

Stronger opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs FC Nantes

2026-04-05 · Ligue 1 · Started

Lighter opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Stade Rennais FC

2026-03-22 · Ligue 1 · Started

Stronger opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs FC Toulouse

2026-03-15 · Ligue 1 · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs RC Lens

2026-03-08 · Ligue 1 · Started

Stronger opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

Profile context and privacyPublic identity fields, release dates and age-protection boundaries.

Position group: Defender
Position: CB

Ages are shown only in whole years. Exact birth dates are not published for any player. Under-18 profiles do not display portraits, physical details, or detailed history.

How to read this profileHigh-level onlyInterpretation guidance and limitations without publishing proprietary calculation weights.

Wonderkid Score

A position-aware discovery score informed by performance, age, playing time and competition context. It prioritizes search and comparison; it is not a career prediction.

Percentiles and scout prompts

Percentiles compare current published role evidence. Low involvement is not automatically a weakness; tactics, opponent quality, sample size and video context still matter.

Versioned release

This score is bound to release global-top-250-2026-07-18. A public “what moved” explanation will appear only after a second comparable score, minutes and role snapshot exists.

Youth age context

Verified private cohort windows can be retained as coarse validation bands. The current release does not apply a relative-age score correction. Exact birth dates are never published, and unavailable context is never inferred.

Detailed model weights, internal provider identifiers and raw source payloads are not part of the public profile. Unavailable athletic-tracking, off-ball, contract and event-location evidence is omitted rather than estimated.

Coverage gapsNot scoredImportant scouting dimensions reserved for verified evidence rather than inferred from conventional event totals.

Athletic tracking

Top speed, acceleration, repeat sprinting and contact tolerance require consistent tracking or testing data.

Off-ball intelligence

Movement, scanning, space creation and pressure behaviour require observed location data or reviewed video.

Scout projection

Ceiling, tactical fit and development priorities require a verified human scouting report and longitudinal evidence.

Spatial evidence

Action maps require verified player-linked event coordinates. Territory, off-ball movement and physical maps require tracking data and are never estimated from totals.

Evidence grade

How much reviewed public evidence supports this profile—not a talent grade.

Strong evidence

A strong reviewed sample across the available position benchmarks.

Senior sample: 1,941 min
Role measures: 5
Requested role coverage: 15 measuresPartial

Snapshot 2026-07-18. Grade presentation follows the reviewed evidence state already attached to the profile.