WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#52CB

Luke Graham

Age 22 · Stoke City · Championship

Stats: Dundee FC · Scottish Premiership · 2025/26

Open profile
70.5
#209CB

Justin Hubner

Age 22 · Fortuna Sittard · Eredivisie

Open profile
62.8

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Luke Graham70.5Luke Graham edgeJustin Hubner62.8
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Luke Graham2 edgesLuke Graham edgeJustin Hubner1 edge
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Luke Graham3,129Luke Graham edgeJustin Hubner1,488
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CB

Luke Graham holds the broader CB edge

4 meaningful role-shape advantages to 0. The largest separation is Duel strength.

7 shared dimensions
Duel strength22 pt edge
9472
Box defending16 pt edge
8367
Aerial authority14 pt edge
9884
Distribution5 pt edge
2924
Defensive activityLevel
6465
Luke GrahamJustin Hubner
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Luke Graham and Justin Hubner on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.PassingLong passingDuels wonTacklesinterception_volumeClearances
Luke GrahamJustin Hubner
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureLuke GrahamJustin Hubner
Wonderkid Score70.5062.80
Board rank#52#209
Age2222
Estimated transfer worth~€4m~€1m
Valuation tierUnder €5mUnder €5m
Appearances3625
Starts3515
Senior minutes3,1291,488
Goals22
Assists11
PositionCentre-BackCentre-Back
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureLuke GrahamJustin Hubner
Passes45.59 /90 · 37th41.55 /90 · 28th
Pass accuracy80.0% · 18th80.1% · 19th
Long passes8.05 /90 · 83rd8.10 /90 · 83rd
Accurate long passes3.28 /90 · 74th3.27 /90 · 74th
Long-pass accuracy40.7% · 33rd40.3% · 32nd
Duels11.91 /90 · 93rd9.19 /90 · 66th
Duels won7.94 /90 · 97th5.56 /90 · 74th
Duel win rate66.7% · 90th60.5% · 70th
Aerial wins4.69 /90 · 98th3.08 /90 · 84th
Interceptions1.38 /90 · 65th1.75 /90 · 84th
Clearances6.73 /90 · 83rd6.96 /90 · 86th
Defensive shot blocks1.06 /90 · 83rd0.73 /90 · 48th
1v1 containment0.43 /900.54 /90
Tackles1.50 /90 · 45th1.75 /90 · 62nd
Discipline0.95 /90 · 56th1.45 /90 · 23rd
Completed passes36.47 /90 · 32nd33.27 /90 · 26th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison