WSWonderkid Scout
All players
#209 boardAerially active centre-backAge 22

Justin Hubner

Across 1,488 published minutes for Fortuna Sittard in the Eredivisie, an aerially active centre-back is the best fit for Justin Hubner. Aerial-win output at 3.08 per 90 (84th percentile) deserves attention; clearance output at 6.96 per 90 (86th percentile) and interception output at 1.75 per 90 (84th percentile) back it up. The longer passing accuracy sits in the 32nd percentile. Target and pressure context will decide how much it limits progression.

IndonesiaFortuna SittardEredivisie1,488 senior minutes
Score as of
Identity updated
Performance sample
pending

Leading signal 1

Aerial wins per 90

84th

Leading signal 2

Clearances per 90

86th

Leading signal 3

Interceptions per 90

84th

Context flag

Long-pass accuracy

32nd percentile · review with role and video context.

Headline output

Current release window

Apps
25
Starts
15
Minutes
1,488
Goals
2
Assists
1
G+A /90
0.18

Visual analysis · 01

Performance fingerprint

The canonical five-axis role shape shows the published percentiles; peer bands add selected advanced values and reviewed role-cohort evidence.

Role profile
Five published, position-aware axes form the canonical role shape for this release. Each point is a direct percentile from the validated public player record.
Centre-BackPartial evidence
Visual signatureCB
Justin Hubner role percentile signatureInterceptions per 90, 84th percentile; Clearances per 90, 86th percentile; Duel win rate, 70th percentile; Aerial wins per 90, 84th percentile; Long-pass accuracy, 32nd percentile. The connected shape is a visual profile, not an additional score.Interceptions84thClearances86thDuels won70thAerial wins84thLong passing32nd
Published player profile50th percentile reference

Exact evidence

Published role-axis percentile

0–100
  1. Interceptions per 9084thpercentile
  2. Clearances per 9086thpercentile
  3. Duel win rate70thpercentile
  4. Aerial wins per 9084thpercentile
  5. Long-pass accuracy32ndpercentile

These published axes describe statistical role shape. They are not Wonderkid Score weights, a talent grade, or a tactical-fit claim.

Peer bands
Current release-window values placed on a 0–100 reviewed role-cohort percentile band. Comparison: Source-specific role cohorts with comparable release-window coverage.

Clearances

6.96 /90

Percentile86th

Long passes

8.10 /90

Percentile83rd

Interceptions

1.75 /90

Percentile84th

Pass accuracy

80.1%

Percentile19th

Aerial wins

3.08 /90

Percentile84th

Completed passes

33.27 /90

Percentile26th

Duels won

5.56 /90

Percentile74th

Accurate long passes

3.27 /90

Percentile74th

Markers show percentile position. Raw-value distribution shapes are withheld when reviewed cohort bins are unavailable.

Visual analysis · 02

Data-led scout read

Scout read
The quickest read on the role, the standout numbers and what still needs film.
Data-led

Role identity

Aerially active centre-back

Centre-Back

Duel win rate at 60.5% adds another credible strength in the 70th percentile. A proper video pass must test the channel, the space behind him and his first decision after a turnover.

Why he catches the eye

  • Interceptions per 9084
  • Clearances per 9086
  • Aerial wins per 9084

What to test on film

  • Long-pass accuracy32

Percentile flags open questions; they do not close them. Video, role, opponent quality and tactical context remain essential.

Evidence status · data screen only

Automated data screen

Published metrics support the role and shortlist prompts shown in this release.

Video observation

This profile does not include a completed live or video scouting assessment.

Projection

No ceiling or tactical-fit grade is published without documented human observation.

Scout read for Justin Hubner

Visual analysis · 03

Comparable role shapes

Nearby public percentile profiles provide a starting point for comparison, not a claim of equal quality or upside.

Similar public profiles
Profile-shape index is a capped 0–100 similarity index built from distance across the same complete published role dimensions with identical constituent metric sets. It is not a probability and does not claim equal ability, potential, or tactical fit. The mean profile-percentile gap compares the average of those matched dimensions.
Profile similarity

Very close role shape

Miguel Freckleton

LASK · Austrian Bundesliga

83

Profile-shape /100

CB
Board rank
#195
Score
63.3
Age
22

Shared high signal: Aerial authority

Mean profile-percentile gap
4.4 mean percentile pts higher
Estimated value tier
Under €5mSame tier as viewed player

Close role shape

Luke Graham

Stoke City · Championship

82

Profile-shape /100

CB
Board rank
#52
Score
70.5
Age
22

Shared high signal: Aerial authority

Mean profile-percentile gap
8.0 mean percentile pts higher
Estimated value tier
Under €5mSame tier as viewed player

Close role shape

Leopold Querfeld

1.FC Union Berlin · Bundesliga

81

Profile-shape /100

CB
Board rank
#32
Score
72.6
Age
22

Shared high signal: Aerial authority

Mean profile-percentile gap
6.3 mean percentile pts higher
Estimated value tier
€10–24m2 tiers higher than viewed player
Similar role profiles for Justin Hubner

Visual analysis · 04

Development tracking

A transparent baseline now, with verified change over time only when comparable future releases exist.

Development baseline
One verified point is recorded. No trend is shown until a second comparable release exists.
Baseline only

Verified score

62.8

Senior minutes

1,488

Registered role

CB

Why there is no trend yet

The next point appears only after another release passes the same model-definition, coverage-window and publication checks. Until then, this card records a baseline and makes no movement claim.

Deep evidence

Inspect the full record

Metric tables, market context, career records, coverage notes and interpretation guidance remain available without competing with the scouting conclusions above.

Full performance tableAdvanced metrics coverage · PartialAdvanced-metric coverage is partial with 15 reviewed percentiles; unavailable measures are omitted.
Advanced performance metrics
Current release-window rates and efficiency signals. Bars show the player's reviewed role-cohort percentile; the printed value remains the primary evidence.

Possession & distribution

6 measures

Long-pass accuracy

40.3%

32nd

percentile

Pass accuracy

80.1%

19th

percentile

Passes

41.55 /90

28th

percentile

Completed passes

33.27 /90

26th

percentile

Long passes

8.10 /90

83rd

percentile

Accurate long passes

3.27 /90

74th

percentile

Defending & duels

9 measures

Aerial wins

3.08 /90

84th

percentile

Clearances

6.96 /90

86th

percentile

Duel win rate

60.5%

70th

percentile

Interceptions

1.75 /90

84th

percentile

Tackles

1.75 /90

62nd

percentile

Defensive shot blocks

0.73 /90

48th

percentile

Duels

9.19 /90

66th

percentile

Duels won

5.56 /90

74th

percentile

1v1 containment

0.54 /90

percentile

Value verified · comparable percentile pending

Discipline

1 measures

Fouls committed per 90

1.45 /90

Lower is better · percentile shown favourably

23rd

percentile

Metric glossary and provenance
Definitions, units and source lineage for the evidence published on this profile.
Inspect 16 published metric definitions
Published metric definitions, measurement units and data sources
MetricDefinitionUnitCalculationHow to read itSource
Long-pass accuracyShare of attempted long passes that were completed.PercentagePublished percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohortNot carried in public record
Pass accuracyShare of attempted passes that were completed.PercentagePublished percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohortNot carried in public record
PassesPasses attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Completed passesPasses completed by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Long passesLong passes attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Accurate long passesCompleted long passes played by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Aerial winsAerial duels won by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
ClearancesDefensive clearances made by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Duel win rateShare of contested duels won by the player.PercentagePublished percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohortNot carried in public record
InterceptionsOpponent passes intercepted by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
TacklesTackles made by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Defensive shot blocksShots or passes blocked by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
DuelsGround and aerial duels contested by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Duels wonGround and aerial duels won by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
1v1 containmentTimes an opponent completed a dribble past the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutes · lower is betterPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordLower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjustedNot carried in public record
DisciplineFouls committed by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutes · lower is betterPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordLower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjustedNot carried in public record

Source seasonNot carried per metric

Release captured

Source data-throughNot carried per metric

Release captured identifies this public release; it does not claim that every upstream source was current through that date. Source names remain unavailable because they are not carried per metric in the public record. Percentiles describe position within the stated comparison context. Wonderkid Score inputs, weights and formula remain proprietary and are not disclosed here.

Market evidenceValuation history coverage · ReadyValuation-history coverage is ready with 2 reviewed historical observations, alongside the separate model estimate and likely-sale range.

Scout estimate

~€1m

Under €5m tier

Rounded Wonderkid Scout estimate · 2026-07-18

Likely-sale range

Not calibrated

Model-led only

Market evidence

No dated anchor

A range will appear only after player-specific evidence is reviewed.

The estimate is informed by dated player-specific market or fee evidence, reviewed comparables, and current football evidence. It is not a quoted fee or asking price.

Historical market observations

Reviewed valuation historyMarket valuation history for Justin Hubner, from €200K to €350K across 2 observations.
2023-12-19€350K last recorded point2024-06-12

Market reference universe: the reviewed Transfermarkt public U23 market-value table. Chart source: dcaribou/transfermarkt-datasets (CC0 1.0; Transfermarkt-derived). Historical observations are not current asking prices.

Club-to-club transfer historyTransfer history coverage · ReadyTransfer-history coverage is ready with 7 reviewed records, newest first.
  1. Wolves U21Fortuna Sittard

    2025-07-29 · Permanent · Fee not reported

  2. Cerezo OsakaWolves U21

    2024-07-16 · Return from loan · Fee not reported

  3. Wolves U21Cerezo Osaka

    2024-03-12 · Loan · Fee not reported

  4. Wolves U18Wolves U23

    2022-01-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported

  5. Den Bosch U17Wolves U18

    2020-01-13 · Permanent · Fee not reported

  6. Den Bosch Yth.Den Bosch U17

    2018-07-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported

  7. Brabant YouthDen Bosch Yth.

    2017-07-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported

Source: salimt/football-datasets (Transfermarkt-derived).

Recorded moves may not form a complete career chain. The current club shown above is reviewed separately.

Recent senior involvementRecent matches coverage · PartialRecent-match coverage is partial with 10 reviewed appearances; unavailable match context is omitted.

vs FC Utrecht

2026-05-17 · Eredivisie · Started

Stronger opponent sample

45'

0G · 0A

vs PEC Zwolle

2026-05-10 · Eredivisie · Started

Lighter opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Feyenoord Rotterdam

2026-05-03 · Eredivisie · Started

Stronger opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs SC Heerenveen

2026-04-25 · Eredivisie · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs NAC Breda

2026-04-12 · Eredivisie · Started

Lighter opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs FC Volendam

2026-03-14 · Eredivisie · Substitute

Peer-level opponent sample

3'

0G · 0A

vs SC Telstar

2026-03-08 · Eredivisie · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

51'

0G · 0A

vs NEC Nijmegen

2026-02-28 · Eredivisie · Started

Stronger opponent sample

90'

1G · 0A

vs Excelsior Rotterdam

2026-02-20 · Eredivisie · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Ajax Amsterdam

2026-02-14 · Eredivisie · Started

Stronger opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

Profile context and privacyPublic identity fields, release dates and age-protection boundaries.
Position group
Defender
Position
CB

Ages are shown only in whole years. Exact birth dates are not published for any player. Under-18 profiles do not display portraits, physical details, or detailed history.

How to read this profileHigh-level onlyInterpretation guidance and limitations without publishing proprietary calculation weights.

Wonderkid Score

A position-aware discovery score informed by performance, age, playing time and competition context. It prioritizes search and comparison; it is not a career prediction.

Percentiles and scout prompts

Percentiles compare current published role evidence. Low involvement is not automatically a weakness; tactics, opponent quality, sample size and video context still matter.

Versioned release

This score is bound to release global-top-250-2026-07-18. A public “what moved” explanation will appear only after a second comparable score, minutes and role snapshot exists.

Youth age context

Verified private cohort windows can be retained as coarse validation bands. The current release does not apply a relative-age score correction. Exact birth dates are never published, and unavailable context is never inferred.

Detailed model weights, internal provider identifiers and raw source payloads are not part of the public profile. Unavailable athletic-tracking, off-ball, contract and event-location evidence is omitted rather than estimated.

Coverage gapsNot scoredImportant scouting dimensions reserved for verified evidence rather than inferred from conventional event totals.

Athletic tracking

Top speed, acceleration, repeat sprinting and contact tolerance require consistent tracking or testing data.

Off-ball intelligence

Movement, scanning, space creation and pressure behaviour require observed location data or reviewed video.

Scout projection

Ceiling, tactical fit and development priorities require a verified human scouting report and longitudinal evidence.

Spatial evidence

Action maps require verified player-linked event coordinates. Territory, off-ball movement and physical maps require tracking data and are never estimated from totals.

Evidence grade
How much reviewed public evidence supports this profile—not a talent grade.
Evidence grade A
Strong evidence

A strong reviewed sample across the available position benchmarks.

Senior sample
1,488 min
Role measures
5
Requested role coverage
15 measuresPartial

Snapshot 2026-07-18. Grade presentation follows the reviewed evidence state already attached to the profile.