WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#6CF

Kauã Elias

Age 20 · FC Shakhtar Donetsk · Ukrainian Premier League

Open profile
79.7
#55CF

Franjo Ivanović

Age 22 · RC Lens · Ligue 1

Stats: Benfica · Liga Portugal · 2025/26

Open profile
70.4

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Kauã Elias79.7Kauã Elias edgeFranjo Ivanović70.4
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Kauã Elias3 edgesKauã Elias edgeFranjo Ivanović1 edge
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Kauã Elias903No clear edgeFranjo Ivanović868
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CF

Kauã Elias holds the broader CF edge

3 meaningful role-shape advantages to 2. The largest separation is Combination play.

7 shared dimensions
Combination play47 pt edge
7932
Aerial authority25 pt edge
4267
Chance creation16 pt edge
6246
One-v-one threat9 pt edge
8475
Finishing threat8 pt edge
8795
Kauã EliasFranjo Ivanović
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Kauã Elias and Franjo Ivanović on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Kauã EliasFranjo Ivanović
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureKauã EliasFranjo Ivanović
Wonderkid Score79.7070.40
Board rank#6#55
Age2022
Estimated transfer worth~€19m~€21m
Valuation tier€10–24m€10–24m
Appearances1825
Starts99
Senior minutes903868
Goals66
Assists21
PositionCentre-ForwardCentre-Forward
Evidencestrongmoderate
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureKauã EliasFranjo Ivanović
Shots3.89 /90 · 95th3.32 /90 · 86th
Shots on target1.89 /90 · 96th1.97 /90 · 97th
Shot accuracy48.7% · 78th59.4% · 93rd
Big chances created0.30 /900.31 /90
Key passes1.30 /90 · 62nd1.04 /90 · 46th
Successful dribbles2.79 /90 · 91st2.18 /90 · 79th
Dribble attempts3.59 /90 · 65th4.15 /90 · 73rd
Dribble success77.8% · 97th52.5% · 74th
Accurate crosses0.10 /900.21 /90
Crosses0.50 /90 · 19th1.35 /90 · 45th
Cross accuracy20.0%15.4%
Ball security1.59 /90 · 44th2.90 /90 · 4th
Fouls won1.00 /90 · 23rd2.28 /90 · 83rd
Passes16.54 /90 · 23rd23.12 /90 · 57th
Completed passes13.36 /90 · 34th16.49 /90 · 54th
Pass accuracy80.7% · 79th71.3% · 32nd
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison