WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#87CB

Kacper Potulski

Age 18 · 1.FSV Mainz 05 · Bundesliga

Open profile
68.0
#209CB

Justin Hubner

Age 22 · Fortuna Sittard · Eredivisie

Open profile
62.8

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Kacper Potulski68.0Kacper Potulski edgeJustin Hubner62.8
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Kacper Potulski0 edgesJustin Hubner edgeJustin Hubner3 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Kacper Potulski1,060Justin Hubner edgeJustin Hubner1,488
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CB

A split role verdict

Kacper Potulski and Justin Hubner each hold 2 meaningful role-shape edges. The largest separation is Long distribution.

7 shared dimensions
Long distribution37 pt edge
2663
Duel strength23 pt edge
4972
Box defending16 pt edge
8367
Ball security7 pt edge
2619
DistributionLevel
2024
Kacper PotulskiJustin Hubner
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Kacper Potulski and Justin Hubner on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.PassingLong passingDuels wonTacklesinterception_volumeClearances
Kacper PotulskiJustin Hubner
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureKacper PotulskiJustin Hubner
Wonderkid Score6862.80
Board rank#87#209
Age1822
Estimated transfer worth~€18m~€1m
Valuation tier€10–24mUnder €5m
Appearances1525
Starts915
Senior minutes1,0601,488
Goals12
Assists11
PositionCentre-BackCentre-Back
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureKacper PotulskiJustin Hubner
Passes37.36 /90 · 17th41.55 /90 · 28th
Pass accuracy82.3% · 26th80.1% · 19th
Long passes4.08 /90 · 21st8.10 /90 · 83rd
Accurate long passes1.70 /90 · 20th3.27 /90 · 74th
Long-pass accuracy41.7% · 36th40.3% · 32nd
Duels9.51 /90 · 71st9.19 /90 · 66th
Duels won5.09 /90 · 62nd5.56 /90 · 74th
Duel win rate53.6% · 35th60.5% · 70th
Aerial wins3.23 /90 · 85th3.08 /90 · 84th
Interceptions1.53 /90 · 75th1.75 /90 · 84th
Clearances6.20 /90 · 73rd6.96 /90 · 86th
Defensive shot blocks1.36 /90 · 92nd0.73 /90 · 48th
1v1 containment0.42 /900.54 /90
Tackles1.27 /90 · 30th1.75 /90 · 62nd
Discipline1.44 /90 · 23rd1.45 /90 · 23rd
Completed passes30.74 /90 · 18th33.27 /90 · 26th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison