WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#209CB

Justin Hubner

Age 22 · Fortuna Sittard · Eredivisie

Open profile
62.8
#52CB

Luke Graham

Age 22 · Stoke City · Championship

Stats: Dundee FC · Scottish Premiership · 2025/26

Open profile
70.5

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Justin Hubner62.8Luke Graham edgeLuke Graham70.5
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Justin Hubner1 edgeLuke Graham edgeLuke Graham2 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Justin Hubner1,488Luke Graham edgeLuke Graham3,129
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CB

Luke Graham holds the broader CB edge

4 meaningful role-shape advantages to 0. The largest separation is Duel strength.

7 shared dimensions
Duel strength22 pt edge
7294
Box defending16 pt edge
6783
Aerial authority14 pt edge
8498
Distribution5 pt edge
2429
Defensive activityLevel
6564
Justin HubnerLuke Graham
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Justin Hubner and Luke Graham on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.PassingLong passingDuels wonTacklesinterception_volumeClearances
Justin HubnerLuke Graham
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureJustin HubnerLuke Graham
Wonderkid Score62.8070.50
Board rank#209#52
Age2222
Estimated transfer worth~€1m~€4m
Valuation tierUnder €5mUnder €5m
Appearances2536
Starts1535
Senior minutes1,4883,129
Goals22
Assists11
PositionCentre-BackCentre-Back
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureJustin HubnerLuke Graham
Passes41.55 /90 · 28th45.59 /90 · 37th
Pass accuracy80.1% · 19th80.0% · 18th
Long passes8.10 /90 · 83rd8.05 /90 · 83rd
Accurate long passes3.27 /90 · 74th3.28 /90 · 74th
Long-pass accuracy40.3% · 32nd40.7% · 33rd
Duels9.19 /90 · 66th11.91 /90 · 93rd
Duels won5.56 /90 · 74th7.94 /90 · 97th
Duel win rate60.5% · 70th66.7% · 90th
Aerial wins3.08 /90 · 84th4.69 /90 · 98th
Interceptions1.75 /90 · 84th1.38 /90 · 65th
Clearances6.96 /90 · 86th6.73 /90 · 83rd
Defensive shot blocks0.73 /90 · 48th1.06 /90 · 83rd
1v1 containment0.54 /900.43 /90
Tackles1.75 /90 · 62nd1.50 /90 · 45th
Discipline1.45 /90 · 23rd0.95 /90 · 56th
Completed passes33.27 /90 · 26th36.47 /90 · 32nd
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison