WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#157CB

Junior Diaz

Age 22 · ESTAC Troyes · Ligue 1

Stats: Stade Brestois 29 · Ligue 1 · 2025/26

Open profile
64.3
#209CB

Justin Hubner

Age 22 · Fortuna Sittard · Eredivisie

Open profile
62.8

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Junior Diaz64.3Junior Diaz edgeJustin Hubner62.8
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Junior Diaz2 edgesJustin Hubner edgeJustin Hubner3 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Junior Diaz1,560No clear edgeJustin Hubner1,488
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CB

Junior Diaz holds the broader CB edge

3 meaningful role-shape advantages to 2. The largest separation is Aerial authority.

7 shared dimensions
Aerial authority39 pt edge
4584
Ball security31 pt edge
5019
Box defending12 pt edge
7967
Duel strength11 pt edge
6172
Defensive activity6 pt edge
7165
Junior DiazJustin Hubner
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Junior Diaz and Justin Hubner on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.PassingLong passingDuels wonTacklesinterception_volumeClearances
Junior DiazJustin Hubner
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureJunior DiazJustin Hubner
Wonderkid Score64.3062.80
Board rank#157#209
Age2222
Estimated transfer worth~€2m~€1m
Valuation tierUnder €5mUnder €5m
Appearances2025
Starts1715
Senior minutes1,5601,488
Goals02
Assists11
PositionCentre-BackCentre-Back
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureJunior DiazJustin Hubner
Passes37.04 /90 · 16th41.55 /90 · 28th
Pass accuracy85.8% · 50th80.1% · 19th
Long passes5.02 /90 · 35th8.10 /90 · 83rd
Accurate long passes2.88 /90 · 62nd3.27 /90 · 74th
Long-pass accuracy57.5% · 90th40.3% · 32nd
Duels6.63 /90 · 20th9.19 /90 · 66th
Duels won4.27 /90 · 37th5.56 /90 · 74th
Duel win rate64.3% · 85th60.5% · 70th
Aerial wins1.96 /90 · 45th3.08 /90 · 84th
Interceptions1.44 /90 · 69th1.75 /90 · 84th
Clearances5.77 /90 · 64th6.96 /90 · 86th
Defensive shot blocks1.38 /90 · 93rd0.73 /90 · 48th
1v1 containment0.23 /900.54 /90
Tackles1.56 /90 · 49th1.75 /90 · 62nd
Discipline0.46 /90 · 94th1.45 /90 · 23rd
Completed passes31.79 /90 · 20th33.27 /90 · 26th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison