WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#55CF

Franjo Ivanović

Age 22 · RC Lens · Ligue 1

Stats: Benfica · Liga Portugal · 2025/26

Open profile
70.4
#18CF

Samu Aghehowa

Age 22 · FC Porto · Liga Portugal

Open profile
74.6

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Franjo Ivanović70.4Samu Aghehowa edgeSamu Aghehowa74.6
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Franjo Ivanović3 edgesFranjo Ivanović edgeSamu Aghehowa0 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Franjo Ivanović868Samu Aghehowa edgeSamu Aghehowa1,416
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CF

Franjo Ivanović holds the broader CF edge

3 meaningful role-shape advantages to 1. The largest separation is Chance creation.

7 shared dimensions
Chance creation31 pt edge
4615
One-v-one threat28 pt edge
7547
Duel strength20 pt edge
5838
Combination play6 pt edge
3238
Shot generationLevel
9194
Franjo IvanovićSamu Aghehowa
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Franjo Ivanović and Samu Aghehowa on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Franjo IvanovićSamu Aghehowa
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureFranjo IvanovićSamu Aghehowa
Wonderkid Score70.4074.60
Board rank#55#18
Age2222
Estimated transfer worth~€21m~€55m
Valuation tier€10–24m€50–69m
Appearances2520
Starts919
Senior minutes8681,416
Goals613
Assists11
PositionCentre-ForwardCentre-Forward
Evidencemoderatestrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureFranjo IvanovićSamu Aghehowa
Shots3.32 /90 · 86th3.56 /90 · 90th
Shots on target1.97 /90 · 97th2.10 /90 · 98th
Shot accuracy59.4% · 93rd58.9% · 93rd
Big chances created0.31 /900.13 /90
Key passes1.04 /90 · 46th0.64 /90 · 15th
Successful dribbles2.18 /90 · 79th1.21 /90 · 49th
Dribble attempts4.15 /90 · 73rd2.86 /90 · 50th
Dribble success52.5% · 74th42.2% · 43rd
Accurate crosses0.21 /900.06 /90
Crosses1.35 /90 · 45th0.32 /90 · 12th
Cross accuracy15.4%20.0%
Ball security2.90 /90 · 4th1.59 /90 · 44th
Fouls won2.28 /90 · 83rd1.72 /90 · 63rd
Passes23.12 /90 · 57th15.51 /90 · 18th
Completed passes16.49 /90 · 54th11.31 /90 · 23rd
Pass accuracy71.3% · 32nd73.0% · 38th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison