WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#39AM

Bilal El Khannouss

Age 22 · VfB Stuttgart · Bundesliga

Open profile
71.8
#2AM

Arda Güler

Age 21 · Real Madrid · LaLiga

Open profile
85.8

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Bilal El Khannouss71.8Arda Güler edgeArda Güler85.8
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Bilal El Khannouss0 edgesArda Güler edgeArda Güler4 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Bilal El Khannouss1,636Arda Güler edgeArda Güler2,028
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · AM

Arda Güler holds the broader AM edge

6 meaningful role-shape advantages to 0. The largest separation is Ball security.

7 shared dimensions
Ball security26 pt edge
5581
Combination play19 pt edge
4261
One-v-one threat11 pt edge
5667
Distribution10 pt edge
8797
Finishing threat6 pt edge
6874
Bilal El KhannoussArda Güler
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Bilal El Khannouss and Arda Güler on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Bilal El KhannoussArda Güler
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureBilal El KhannoussArda Güler
Wonderkid Score71.8085.80
Board rank#39#2
Age2221
Estimated transfer worth~€35m~€125m
Valuation tier€25–49m€100–149m
Appearances2533
Starts1925
Senior minutes1,6362,028
Goals44
Assists59
PositionAttacking MidfieldAttacking Midfield
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureBilal El KhannoussArda Güler
xG per 900.17 /90 · 66th0.21 /90 · 73rd
Non-penalty xG per 900.17 /90 · 66th0.21 /90 · 73rd
xA per 900.29 /90 · 92nd0.38 /90 · 98th
Shots2.31 /90 · 84th2.17 /90 · 82nd
Shots on target0.83 /90 · 84th0.84 /90 · 85th
Shot accuracy35.7% · 58th38.8% · 67th
Big chances created0.44 /900.67 /90
Key passes2.48 /90 · 97th3.11 /90 · 99th
Successful dribbles0.99 /90 · 54th1.20 /90 · 66th
Dribble attempts1.76 /90 · 41st1.91 /90 · 48th
Dribble success56.2% · 72nd62.8% · 85th
Accurate crosses1.32 /901.73 /90
Crosses3.63 /90 · 86th5.77 /90 · 96th
Cross accuracy36.4%30.0%
Ball security1.10 /90 · 55th0.75 /90 · 81st
xG chain per 900.61 /90 · 57th0.70 /90 · 69th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison