#116 boardHigh-save-rate goalkeeper with long distributionAge 22

Viktor Dolgyi

In a 1,034-minute published sample for FC Oleksandriya in the Ukrainian Premier League, Viktor Dolgyi profiles as a high-save-rate goalkeeper with long distribution, although the role remains provisional. Save-rate return at 78.3% (88th percentile) stands out as a role marker; long-pass accuracy at 50.6% (85th percentile) and pass completion at 80.1% (83rd percentile) back it up. There is enough signal to keep watching, but this is still a first read rather than a settled role.

UkraineFC OleksandriyaUkrainian Premier League1,034 senior minutes

Score as of: 2026-07-18
Identity updated: 2026-08-26
Performance sample: pending

Leading signal 1

Save-rate proxy

88th

Leading signal 2

Long-pass accuracy

85th

Leading signal 3

Pass completion

83rd

Context flag

No clear role-critical concern in the published sample

Video review remains essential.

Headline output

Current release window

Apps: 12
Starts: 11
Minutes: 1,034
Goals: 0
Assists: 0
G+A /90: 0.00

Visual analysis · 01

Performance fingerprint

The canonical five-axis role shape shows the published percentiles; peer bands add selected advanced values and reviewed role-cohort evidence.

Role profile

Five published, position-aware axes form the canonical role shape for this release. Each point is a direct percentile from the validated public player record.

GoalkeeperPartial evidence

Visual signatureGK

Published player profile50th percentile reference

Exact evidence

Published role-axis percentile

0–100

Saves per 9089thpercentile
Goals conceded per 90 (inverted)74thpercentile
Box saves per 9069thpercentile
Pass completion83rdpercentile
Long-pass accuracy85thpercentile

These published axes describe statistical role shape. They are not Wonderkid Score weights, a talent grade, or a tactical-fit claim.

Peer bands

Current release-window values placed on a 0–100 reviewed role-cohort percentile band. Comparison: Source-specific role cohorts with comparable release-window coverage.

Saves

4.09 /90

Percentile89th

Long passes

7.05 /90

Percentile5th

Save-rate proxy

78.3%

Percentile88th

Passes

20.98 /90

Percentile7th

Inside-box save share

53.2%

Percentile19th

Accurate long passes

3.57 /90

Percentile10th

Goals conceded

1.13 /90

Percentile74th

Long-pass accuracy

50.6%

Percentile85th

Markers show percentile position. Raw-value distribution shapes are withheld when reviewed cohort bins are unavailable.

Visual analysis · 02

Data-led scout read

Scout read

The quickest read on the role, the standout numbers and what still needs film.

Data-led

Role identity

High-save-rate goalkeeper with long distribution

Goalkeeper

Team goals-conceded rate is 1.13 per 90, a favourable 74th-percentile return. It remains a team result until shot quality and defensive context are accounted for. A full video pass must separate shot difficulty from technique and test his decisions when opponents lock the short build-up.

Why he catches the eye

Save-rate proxy88
Pass completion83
Long-pass accuracy85

What to test on film

The published measures do not flag one obvious statistical concern.

Percentile flags open questions; they do not close them. Video, role, opponent quality and tactical context remain essential.

Evidence status · data screen only

Automated data screen

Published metrics support the role and shortlist prompts shown in this release.

Video observation

This profile does not include a completed live or video scouting assessment.

Projection

No ceiling or tactical-fit grade is published without documented human observation.

Visual analysis · 03

Comparable role shapes

Nearby public percentile profiles provide a starting point for comparison, not a claim of equal quality or upside.

Similar public profiles

Profile-shape index is a capped 0–100 similarity index built from distance across the same complete published role dimensions with identical constituent metric sets. It is not a probability and does not claim equal ability, potential, or tactical fit. The mean profile-percentile gap compares the average of those matched dimensions.

Profile similarity

Close role shape

Oleksandr Saputin

Zorya Lugansk · Ukrainian Premier League

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #92
Score: 67.6
Age: 22

Shared high signal: Ball security

Mean profile-percentile gap: 10.3 mean percentile pts higher
Estimated value tier: Under €5mSame tier as viewed player

Profile Compare

Close role shape

Ivan Pakholyuk

Kolos Kovalivka · Ukrainian Premier League

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #94
Score: 67.5
Age: 22

Shared high signal: Ball security

Mean profile-percentile gap: 9.0 mean percentile pts higher
Estimated value tier: Under €5mSame tier as viewed player

Profile Compare

Close role shape

Robin Risser

RC Lens · Ligue 1

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #226
Score: 62.0
Age: 21

Shared high signal: Ball security

Mean profile-percentile gap: 3.9 mean percentile pts lower
Estimated value tier: €25–49m3 tiers higher than viewed player

Profile Compare

Visual analysis · 04

Development tracking

A transparent baseline now, with verified change over time only when comparable future releases exist.

Development baseline

One verified point is recorded. No trend is shown until a second comparable release exists.

Baseline only

Verified score

66.3

Senior minutes

1,034

Registered role

Why there is no trend yet

The next point appears only after another release passes the same model-definition, coverage-window and publication checks. Until then, this card records a baseline and makes no movement claim.

Deep evidence

Inspect the full record

Metric tables, market context, career records, coverage notes and interpretation guidance remain available without competing with the scouting conclusions above.

Full performance tableAdvanced metrics coverage · PartialAdvanced-metric coverage is partial with 11 reviewed percentiles; unavailable measures are omitted.

Advanced performance metrics

Current release-window rates and efficiency signals. Bars show the player's reviewed role-cohort percentile; the printed value remains the primary evidence.

Possession & distribution

6 measures

Long-pass accuracy

50.6%

85th

percentile

Pass accuracy

80.1%

83rd

percentile

Passes

20.98 /90

7th

percentile

Completed passes

16.80 /90

23rd

percentile

Long passes

7.05 /90

5th

percentile

Accurate long passes

3.57 /90

10th

percentile

Goalkeeping

5 measures

Inside-box saves

2.18 /90

69th

percentile

Goals conceded per 90

1.13 /90

Lower is better · percentile shown favourably

74th

percentile

Save-rate proxy

78.3%

88th

percentile

Saves

4.09 /90

89th

percentile

Inside-box save share

53.2%

19th

percentile

Metric glossary and provenance

Definitions, units and source lineage for the evidence published on this profile.

Inspect 11 published metric definitions

Published metric definitions, measurement units and data sources
Metric	Definition	Unit	Calculation	How to read it	Source
Long-pass accuracy	Share of attempted long passes that were completed.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Pass accuracy	Share of attempted passes that were completed.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Passes	Passes attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Completed passes	Passes completed by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Long passes	Long passes attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Accurate long passes	Completed long passes played by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Inside-box saves	Saves made against shots from inside the penalty area, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Goals conceded	Goals conceded while the goalkeeper was playing, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes · lower is better	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Lower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjusted	Not carried in public record
Save-rate proxy	Share of on-target shots faced that were saved in the published sample.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Saves	Saves made by the goalkeeper, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Inside-box save share	Share of the goalkeeper’s saves made against shots from inside the penalty area.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record

Source seasonNot carried per metric

Release captured2026-07-18

Source data-throughNot carried per metric

Release captured identifies this public release; it does not claim that every upstream source was current through that date. Source names remain unavailable because they are not carried per metric in the public record. Percentiles describe position within the stated comparison context. Wonderkid Score inputs, weights and formula remain proprietary and are not disclosed here.

Market evidenceValuation history coverage · ReadyValuation-history coverage is ready with 5 reviewed historical observations, alongside the separate model estimate and likely-sale range.

Scout estimate

~€1m

Under €5m tier

Rounded Wonderkid Scout estimate · 2026-07-18

Likely-sale range

Not calibrated

Model-led only

Market evidence

No dated anchor

A range will appear only after player-specific evidence is reviewed.

The estimate is informed by dated player-specific market or fee evidence, reviewed comparables, and current football evidence. It is not a quoted fee or asking price.

Historical market observations

2023-12-11€400K last recorded point2025-12-18

Market reference universe: the reviewed Transfermarkt public U23 market-value table. Chart source: dcaribou/transfermarkt-datasets (CC0 1.0; Transfermarkt-derived). Historical observations are not current asking prices.

Club-to-club transfer historyTransfer history coverage · ReadyTransfer-history coverage is ready with 3 reviewed records, newest first.

Oleksandria U19FC Oleksandriya
2024-01-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported
SC Dnipro-1 U19Oleksandria U19
2023-03-30 · Permanent · Fee not reported
OFKIP KyivSC Dnipro-1 U19
2022-02-21 · Permanent · Fee not reported

Source: salimt/football-datasets (Transfermarkt-derived).

Recorded moves may not form a complete career chain. The current club shown above is reviewed separately.

Recent senior involvementRecent matches coverage · PartialRecent-match coverage is partial with 10 reviewed appearances; unavailable match context is omitted.

vs Kolos Kovalivka

2026-05-02 · Ukrainian Premier League · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Epicentr Kamyanets-Podilskyi

2026-04-27 · Ukrainian Premier League · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs SC Poltava

2026-04-03 · Ukrainian Premier League · Started

Lighter opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Rukh Lviv

2025-11-30 · Ukrainian Premier League · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Zorya Lugansk

2025-11-24 · Ukrainian Premier League · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs FK Polissya Zhytomyr

2025-11-09 · Ukrainian Premier League · Started

Stronger opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Kolos Kovalivka

2025-11-01 · Ukrainian Premier League · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Epicentr Kamyanets-Podilskyi

2025-10-24 · Ukrainian Premier League · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs NK Veres Rivne

2025-10-19 · Ukrainian Premier League · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Karpaty Lviv

2025-10-04 · Ukrainian Premier League · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

Profile context and privacyPublic identity fields, release dates and age-protection boundaries.

Position group: Goalkeeper
Position: GK

Ages are shown only in whole years. Exact birth dates are not published for any player. Under-18 profiles do not display portraits, physical details, or detailed history.

How to read this profileHigh-level onlyInterpretation guidance and limitations without publishing proprietary calculation weights.

Wonderkid Score

A position-aware discovery score informed by performance, age, playing time and competition context. It prioritizes search and comparison; it is not a career prediction.

Percentiles and scout prompts

Percentiles compare current published role evidence. Low involvement is not automatically a weakness; tactics, opponent quality, sample size and video context still matter.

Versioned release

This score is bound to release global-top-250-2026-07-18. A public “what moved” explanation will appear only after a second comparable score, minutes and role snapshot exists.

Youth age context

Verified private cohort windows can be retained as coarse validation bands. The current release does not apply a relative-age score correction. Exact birth dates are never published, and unavailable context is never inferred.

Detailed model weights, internal provider identifiers and raw source payloads are not part of the public profile. Unavailable athletic-tracking, off-ball, contract and event-location evidence is omitted rather than estimated.

Coverage gapsNot scoredImportant scouting dimensions reserved for verified evidence rather than inferred from conventional event totals.

Athletic tracking

Top speed, acceleration, repeat sprinting and contact tolerance require consistent tracking or testing data.

Off-ball intelligence

Movement, scanning, space creation and pressure behaviour require observed location data or reviewed video.

Scout projection

Ceiling, tactical fit and development priorities require a verified human scouting report and longitudinal evidence.

Spatial evidence

Action maps require verified player-linked event coordinates. Territory, off-ball movement and physical maps require tracking data and are never estimated from totals.

Evidence grade

How much reviewed public evidence supports this profile—not a talent grade.

Strong evidence

A strong reviewed sample across the available position benchmarks.

Senior sample: 1,034 min
Role measures: 5
Requested role coverage: 11 measuresPartial

Snapshot 2026-07-18. Grade presentation follows the reviewed evidence state already attached to the profile.