WSWonderkid Scout
All players
#185 boardHigh-shot-volume centre-forwardAge 22

Romeo Vermant

Across 1,317 published minutes for Club Brugge KV in the Belgian Pro League, Romeo Vermant reads most clearly as a high-shot-volume centre-forward. Shot volume at 3.28 per 90 (85th percentile) gives the role a firm starting point. Shot accuracy is steadier rather than decisive in the 53rd percentile. Take-on efficiency sits in the 4th percentile. Attempt difficulty and choice of moment need film before that becomes a firm concern.

BelgiumClub Brugge KVBelgian Pro League1,317 senior minutes
Score as of
Identity updated
Performance sample
pending

Leading signal 1

Shots per 90

85th

Leading signal 2

Shot accuracy

53rd

Leading signal 3

Key passes per 90

54th

Context flag

Dribble success

4th percentile · review with role and video context.

Headline output

Current release window

Apps
35
Starts
13
Minutes
1,317
Goals
8
Assists
2
G+A /90
0.68

Visual analysis · 01

Performance fingerprint

The canonical five-axis role shape shows the published percentiles; peer bands add selected advanced values and reviewed role-cohort evidence.

Role profile
Five published, position-aware axes form the canonical role shape for this release. Each point is a direct percentile from the validated public player record.
Centre-ForwardPartial evidence
Visual signatureCF
Romeo Vermant role percentile signatureShots per 90, 85th percentile; Shot accuracy, 53rd percentile; Key passes per 90, 54th percentile; Dribble success, 4th percentile; Big chances created per 90, 19th percentile. The connected shape is a visual profile, not an additional score.Shot volume85thShot accuracy53rdKey passes54thDribbling4thBig chances19th
Published player profile50th percentile reference

Exact evidence

Published role-axis percentile

0–100
  1. Shots per 9085thpercentile
  2. Shot accuracy53rdpercentile
  3. Key passes per 9054thpercentile
  4. Dribble success4thpercentile
  5. Big chances created per 9019thpercentile

These published axes describe statistical role shape. They are not Wonderkid Score weights, a talent grade, or a tactical-fit claim.

Peer bands
Current release-window values placed on a 0–100 reviewed role-cohort percentile band. Comparison: Source-specific role cohorts with comparable release-window coverage.

Dribble success

23.8%

Percentile4th

Passes

26.24 /90

Percentile72nd

Successful dribbles

0.34 /90

Percentile5th

Completed passes

18.93 /90

Percentile65th

Crosses

0.21 /90

Percentile6th

Pass accuracy

72.1%

Percentile36th

Fouls won

2.39 /90

Percentile85th

Ball security

1.71 /90

Percentile37th

Markers show percentile position. Raw-value distribution shapes are withheld when reviewed cohort bins are unavailable.

Visual analysis · 02

Data-led scout read

Scout read
The quickest read on the role, the standout numbers and what still needs film.
Data-led

Role identity

High-shot-volume centre-forward

Centre-Forward

Pass completion at 72.1% sits in the 36th percentile. That is a gap to investigate rather than another plus. A complete No. 9 read needs the possessions without a shot—how he pins, links and starts the pressure.

Why he catches the eye

  • Shots per 9085

What to test on film

  • Dribble success4
  • Big chances created per 9019

Percentile flags open questions; they do not close them. Video, role, opponent quality and tactical context remain essential.

Evidence status · data screen only

Automated data screen

Published metrics support the role and shortlist prompts shown in this release.

Video observation

This profile does not include a completed live or video scouting assessment.

Projection

No ceiling or tactical-fit grade is published without documented human observation.

Scout read for Romeo Vermant

Visual analysis · 03

Comparable role shapes

Nearby public percentile profiles provide a starting point for comparison, not a claim of equal quality or upside.

Similar public profiles
Profile-shape index is a capped 0–100 similarity index built from distance across the same complete published role dimensions with identical constituent metric sets. It is not a probability and does not claim equal ability, potential, or tactical fit. The mean profile-percentile gap compares the average of those matched dimensions.
Profile similarity

Very close role shape

Pio Esposito

Inter Milan · Serie A

86

Profile-shape /100

CF
Board rank
#112
Score
66.5
Age
21

Shared high signal: Aerial authority

Mean profile-percentile gap
4.0 mean percentile pts higher
Estimated value tier
€90–99m5 tiers higher than viewed player

Close role shape

Nicolò Tresoldi

Club Brugge KV · Belgian Pro League

75

Profile-shape /100

CF
Board rank
#8
Score
77.8
Age
21

Shared high signal: Shot generation

Mean profile-percentile gap
10.0 mean percentile pts higher
Estimated value tier
€25–49m2 tiers higher than viewed player

Close role shape

Barney Stewart

West Bromwich Albion · Championship

75

Profile-shape /100

CF
Board rank
#212
Score
62.5
Age
22

Shared high signal: Aerial authority

Mean profile-percentile gap
6.1 mean percentile pts lower
Estimated value tier
Under €5m1 tier lower than viewed player
Similar role profiles for Romeo Vermant

Visual analysis · 04

Development tracking

A transparent baseline now, with verified change over time only when comparable future releases exist.

Development baseline
One verified point is recorded. No trend is shown until a second comparable release exists.
Baseline only

Verified score

63.6

Senior minutes

1,317

Registered role

CF

Why there is no trend yet

The next point appears only after another release passes the same model-definition, coverage-window and publication checks. Until then, this card records a baseline and makes no movement claim.

Deep evidence

Inspect the full record

Metric tables, market context, career records, coverage notes and interpretation guidance remain available without competing with the scouting conclusions above.

Full performance tableAdvanced metrics coverage · PartialAdvanced-metric coverage is partial with 18 reviewed percentiles; unavailable measures are omitted.
Advanced performance metrics
Current release-window rates and efficiency signals. Bars show the player's reviewed role-cohort percentile; the printed value remains the primary evidence.

Attacking & creation

10 measures

Big chances created

0.14 /90

percentile

Value verified · comparable percentile pending

Crosses

0.21 /90

6th

percentile

Dribble success

23.8%

4th

percentile

Key passes

1.16 /90

54th

percentile

Shot accuracy

39.6%

53rd

percentile

Shots

3.28 /90

85th

percentile

Shots on target

1.30 /90

81st

percentile

Dribble attempts

1.44 /90

16th

percentile

Successful dribbles

0.34 /90

5th

percentile

Fouls won

2.39 /90

85th

percentile

Possession & distribution

4 measures

Passes

26.24 /90

72nd

percentile

Completed passes

18.93 /90

65th

percentile

Pass accuracy

72.1%

36th

percentile

Dispossessed per 90

1.71 /90

Lower is better · percentile shown favourably

37th

percentile

Defending & duels

4 measures

Duels

16.95 /90

85th

percentile

Duels won

6.56 /90

77th

percentile

Duel win rate

38.7%

30th

percentile

Aerial wins

2.73 /90

86th

percentile

Discipline

1 measures

Fouls committed per 90

2.80 /90

Lower is better · percentile shown favourably

8th

percentile

Metric glossary and provenance
Definitions, units and source lineage for the evidence published on this profile.
Inspect 19 published metric definitions
Published metric definitions, measurement units and data sources
MetricDefinitionUnitCalculationHow to read itSource
Big chances createdProvider-classified big chances created, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohortNot carried in public record
CrossesCrosses attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Dribble successShare of attempted dribbles completed successfully.PercentagePublished percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohortNot carried in public record
Key passesPasses that directly create a shot, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohortNot carried in public record
Shot accuracyShare of attempted shots that were on target.PercentagePublished percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohortNot carried in public record
ShotsShots attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Shots on targetShots on target by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Dribble attemptsDribbles attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Successful dribblesDribbles completed successfully, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Fouls wonFouls drawn by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
PassesPasses attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Completed passesPasses completed by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Pass accuracyShare of attempted passes that were completed.PercentagePublished percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohortNot carried in public record
Ball securityTimes the player lost possession to an opponent challenge, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutes · lower is betterPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordLower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjustedNot carried in public record
DuelsGround and aerial duels contested by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Duels wonGround and aerial duels won by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
Duel win rateShare of contested duels won by the player.PercentagePublished percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohortNot carried in public record
Aerial winsAerial duels won by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutesPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordHigher means more involvement, not automatically better performanceNot carried in public record
DisciplineFouls committed by the player, normalized for playing time.Per 90 minutes · lower is betterPublished rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public recordLower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjustedNot carried in public record

Source seasonNot carried per metric

Release captured

Source data-throughNot carried per metric

Release captured identifies this public release; it does not claim that every upstream source was current through that date. Source names remain unavailable because they are not carried per metric in the public record. Percentiles describe position within the stated comparison context. Wonderkid Score inputs, weights and formula remain proprietary and are not disclosed here.

Market evidenceValuation history coverage · ReadyValuation-history coverage is ready with 12 reviewed historical observations, alongside the separate model estimate and likely-sale range.

Scout estimate

~€8m

€5–9m tier

Rounded Wonderkid Scout estimate · 2026-07-18

Likely-sale range

Not calibrated

Model-led only

Market evidence

No dated anchor

A range will appear only after player-specific evidence is reviewed.

The estimate is informed by dated player-specific market or fee evidence, reviewed comparables, and current football evidence. It is not a quoted fee or asking price.

Historical market observations

Reviewed valuation historyMarket valuation history for Romeo Vermant, from €50K to €8M across 12 observations.
2020-10-21€8M last recorded point2025-12-10

Market reference universe: the reviewed Transfermarkt public U23 market-value table. Chart source: dcaribou/transfermarkt-datasets (CC0 1.0; Transfermarkt-derived). Historical observations are not current asking prices.

Club-to-club transfer historyTransfer history coverage · ReadyTransfer-history coverage is ready with 5 reviewed records, newest first.
  1. KVC WesterloClub Brugge

    2024-06-30 · Return from loan · Fee not reported

  2. Club BruggeKVC Westerlo

    2024-01-22 · Loan · Fee not reported

  3. Club NXTClub Brugge

    2023-03-15 · Permanent · Fee not reported

  4. FC Brügge U18Club NXT

    2020-07-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported

  5. Club Brugge YthFC Brügge U18

    2020-01-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported

Source: salimt/football-datasets (Transfermarkt-derived).

Recorded moves may not form a complete career chain. The current club shown above is reviewed separately.

Recent senior involvementRecent matches coverage · PartialRecent-match coverage is partial with 10 reviewed appearances; unavailable match context is omitted.

vs KAA Gent

2026-05-24 · EJPL · Substitute

Peer-level opponent sample

28'

0G · 0A

vs KV Mechelen

2026-05-21 · EJPL · Substitute

Peer-level opponent sample

11'

0G · 0A

vs Union Saint-Gilloise

2026-05-17 · EJPL · Substitute

Stronger opponent sample

15'

0G · 0A

vs Sint-Truidense VV

2026-05-09 · EJPL · Substitute

Stronger opponent sample

17'

0G · 0A

vs RSC Anderlecht

2026-05-03 · EJPL · Substitute

Peer-level opponent sample

15'

0G · 0A

vs KAA Gent

2026-04-26 · EJPL · Substitute

Peer-level opponent sample

17'

0G · 0A

vs KV Mechelen

2026-04-22 · EJPL · Substitute

Peer-level opponent sample

19'

0G · 0A

vs Union Saint-Gilloise

2026-04-19 · EJPL · Started

Stronger opponent sample

90'

0G · 0A

vs Sint-Truidense VV

2026-04-11 · EJPL · Substitute

Stronger opponent sample

7'

0G · 0A

vs RSC Anderlecht

2026-04-06 · EJPL · Substitute

Peer-level opponent sample

26'

1G · 0A

Profile context and privacyPublic identity fields, release dates and age-protection boundaries.
Position group
Forward
Position
CF

Ages are shown only in whole years. Exact birth dates are not published for any player. Under-18 profiles do not display portraits, physical details, or detailed history.

How to read this profileHigh-level onlyInterpretation guidance and limitations without publishing proprietary calculation weights.

Wonderkid Score

A position-aware discovery score informed by performance, age, playing time and competition context. It prioritizes search and comparison; it is not a career prediction.

Percentiles and scout prompts

Percentiles compare current published role evidence. Low involvement is not automatically a weakness; tactics, opponent quality, sample size and video context still matter.

Versioned release

This score is bound to release global-top-250-2026-07-18. A public “what moved” explanation will appear only after a second comparable score, minutes and role snapshot exists.

Youth age context

Verified private cohort windows can be retained as coarse validation bands. The current release does not apply a relative-age score correction. Exact birth dates are never published, and unavailable context is never inferred.

Detailed model weights, internal provider identifiers and raw source payloads are not part of the public profile. Unavailable athletic-tracking, off-ball, contract and event-location evidence is omitted rather than estimated.

Coverage gapsNot scoredImportant scouting dimensions reserved for verified evidence rather than inferred from conventional event totals.

Athletic tracking

Top speed, acceleration, repeat sprinting and contact tolerance require consistent tracking or testing data.

Off-ball intelligence

Movement, scanning, space creation and pressure behaviour require observed location data or reviewed video.

Scout projection

Ceiling, tactical fit and development priorities require a verified human scouting report and longitudinal evidence.

Spatial evidence

Action maps require verified player-linked event coordinates. Territory, off-ball movement and physical maps require tracking data and are never estimated from totals.

Evidence grade
How much reviewed public evidence supports this profile—not a talent grade.
Evidence grade A
Strong evidence

A strong reviewed sample across the available position benchmarks.

Senior sample
1,317 min
Role measures
5
Requested role coverage
18 measuresPartial

Snapshot 2026-07-18. Grade presentation follows the reviewed evidence state already attached to the profile.