#33 boardOne-versus-one left wingerAge 18

Oskar Pietuszewski

In an 820-minute published sample for FC Porto in Liga Portugal, Oskar Pietuszewski has the beginnings of a one-versus-one left winger. Take-on volume at 6.37 per 90 (95th percentile) describes the job, while shots-on-target volume at 1.21 per 90 (76th percentile) and shot accuracy at 47.8% (77th percentile) strengthen the case. Big-chance supply has not separated him, ranking in the 40th percentile. Film must distinguish general shot creation from the weight and timing of his final ball.

PolandFC PortoLiga Portugal820 senior minutes

Photo: Robert Stępkowski · CC0 1.0. Commons file · License

Score as of: 2026-07-18
Identity updated: 2026-08-26
Performance sample: pending

Leading signal 1

Dribble attempts

95th

Leading signal 2

Shots on target

76th

Leading signal 3

Shot accuracy

77th

Context flag

Big chances created per 90

40th percentile · review with role and video context.

Headline output

Current release window

Apps: 16
Starts: 11
Minutes: 820
Goals: 3
Assists: 2
G+A /90: 0.55

Visual analysis · 01

Performance fingerprint

The canonical five-axis role shape shows the published percentiles; peer bands add selected advanced values and reviewed role-cohort evidence.

Role profile

Five published, position-aware axes form the canonical role shape for this release. Each point is a direct percentile from the validated public player record.

Left WingerPartial evidence

Visual signatureLW

Published player profile50th percentile reference

Exact evidence

Published role-axis percentile

0–100

Shots per 9062ndpercentile
Shot accuracy77thpercentile
Key passes per 9051stpercentile
Dribble success56thpercentile
Big chances created per 9040thpercentile

These published axes describe statistical role shape. They are not Wonderkid Score weights, a talent grade, or a tactical-fit claim.

Peer bands

Current release-window values placed on a 0–100 reviewed role-cohort percentile band. Comparison: Source-specific role cohorts with comparable release-window coverage.

Dribble attempts

6.37 /90

Percentile95th

Ball security

1.98 /90

Percentile23rd

Fouls won

3.07 /90

Percentile94th

Pass accuracy

71.6%

Percentile33rd

Successful dribbles

2.96 /90

Percentile92nd

Completed passes

14.38 /90

Percentile39th

Shot accuracy

47.8%

Percentile77th

Passes

20.09 /90

Percentile43rd

Markers show percentile position. Raw-value distribution shapes are withheld when reviewed cohort bins are unavailable.

Visual analysis · 02

Data-led scout read

Scout read

The quickest read on the role, the standout numbers and what still needs film.

Data-led

Role identity

One-versus-one left winger

Left Winger

Crossing volume at 2.41 per 90 returns in the 65th percentile. It matters to the description more than the final grade. For Oskar Pietuszewski, film must show the decisions once opponents double the flank or deny the first touch forward.

Why he catches the eye

Dribble attempts95
Shots on target76
Shot accuracy77

What to test on film

Big chances created per 9040

Percentile flags open questions; they do not close them. Video, role, opponent quality and tactical context remain essential.

Evidence status · data screen only

Automated data screen

Published metrics support the role and shortlist prompts shown in this release.

Video observation

This profile does not include a completed live or video scouting assessment.

Projection

No ceiling or tactical-fit grade is published without documented human observation.

Visual analysis · 03

Comparable role shapes

Nearby public percentile profiles provide a starting point for comparison, not a claim of equal quality or upside.

Similar public profiles

Profile-shape index is a capped 0–100 similarity index built from distance across the same complete published role dimensions with identical constituent metric sets. It is not a probability and does not claim equal ability, potential, or tactical fit. The mean profile-percentile gap compares the average of those matched dimensions.

Profile similarity

Close role shape

Prosper Obah

LNZ Cherkasy · Ukrainian Premier League

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #57
Score: 70.3
Age: 22

Shared high signal: One-v-one threat

Mean profile-percentile gap: 3.6 mean percentile pts higher
Estimated value tier: Under €5m3 tiers lower than viewed player

Profile Compare

Related role shape

Said El Mala

1.FC Köln · Bundesliga

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #53
Score: 70.5
Age: 19

Shared high signal: Finishing threat

Mean profile-percentile gap: 7.3 mean percentile pts lower
Estimated value tier: €25–49mSame tier as viewed player

Profile Compare

Related role shape

Prince Amoako Junior

FC Nordsjaelland · Danish Superliga

Profile-shape /100

Board rank: #60
Score: 70.2
Age: 19

Shared high signal: One-v-one threat

Mean profile-percentile gap: 8.4 mean percentile pts lower
Estimated value tier: €5–9m2 tiers lower than viewed player

Profile Compare

Visual analysis · 04

Development tracking

A transparent baseline now, with verified change over time only when comparable future releases exist.

Development baseline

One verified point is recorded. No trend is shown until a second comparable release exists.

Baseline only

Verified score

72.5

Senior minutes

820

Registered role

Why there is no trend yet

The next point appears only after another release passes the same model-definition, coverage-window and publication checks. Until then, this card records a baseline and makes no movement claim.

Deep evidence

Inspect the full record

Metric tables, market context, career records, coverage notes and interpretation guidance remain available without competing with the scouting conclusions above.

Full performance tableAdvanced metrics coverage · ReadyAdvanced-metric coverage is ready with 18 reviewed percentiles, rates and efficiency values.

Advanced performance metrics

Current release-window rates and efficiency signals. Bars show the player's reviewed role-cohort percentile; the printed value remains the primary evidence.

Attacking & creation

12 measures

Accurate crosses

0.66 /90

—

percentile

Value verified · comparable percentile pending

Big chances created

0.22 /90

—

percentile

Value verified · comparable percentile pending

Cross accuracy

27.3%

—

percentile

Value verified · comparable percentile pending

Crosses

2.41 /90

65th

percentile

Dribble success

46.6%

56th

percentile

Key passes

1.10 /90

51st

percentile

Shot accuracy

47.8%

77th

percentile

Shots

2.52 /90

62nd

percentile

Shots on target

1.21 /90

76th

percentile

Dribble attempts

6.37 /90

95th

percentile

Successful dribbles

2.96 /90

92nd

percentile

Fouls won

3.07 /90

94th

percentile

Possession & distribution

4 measures

Passes

20.09 /90

43rd

percentile

Completed passes

14.38 /90

39th

percentile

Pass accuracy

71.6%

33rd

percentile

Dispossessed per 90

1.98 /90

Lower is better · percentile shown favourably

23rd

percentile

Defending & duels

4 measures

Duels

17.12 /90

87th

percentile

Duels won

8.67 /90

95th

percentile

Duel win rate

50.6%

86th

percentile

Aerial wins

0.66 /90

35th

percentile

Discipline

1 measures

Fouls committed per 90

1.65 /90

Lower is better · percentile shown favourably

36th

percentile

Metric glossary and provenance

Definitions, units and source lineage for the evidence published on this profile.

Inspect 21 published metric definitions

Published metric definitions, measurement units and data sources
Metric	Definition	Unit	Calculation	How to read it	Source
Accurate crosses	Completed crosses delivered by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Big chances created	Provider-classified big chances created, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Cross accuracy	Share of attempted crosses that were completed.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Crosses	Crosses attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Dribble success	Share of attempted dribbles completed successfully.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Key passes	Passes that directly create a shot, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Shot accuracy	Share of attempted shots that were on target.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Shots	Shots attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Shots on target	Shots on target by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Dribble attempts	Dribbles attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Successful dribbles	Dribbles completed successfully, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Fouls won	Fouls drawn by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Passes	Passes attempted by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Completed passes	Passes completed by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Pass accuracy	Share of attempted passes that were completed.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Ball security	Times the player lost possession to an opponent challenge, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes · lower is better	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Lower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjusted	Not carried in public record
Duels	Ground and aerial duels contested by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Duels won	Ground and aerial duels won by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Duel win rate	Share of contested duels won by the player.	Percentage	Published percentage; numerator and denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher percentile is favourable within the stated role cohort	Not carried in public record
Aerial wins	Aerial duels won by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Higher means more involvement, not automatically better performance	Not carried in public record
Discipline	Fouls committed by the player, normalized for playing time.	Per 90 minutes · lower is better	Published rate per 90; numerator and minute denominator are not carried in the public record	Lower raw rate is favourable; the displayed percentile is direction-adjusted	Not carried in public record

Source seasonNot carried per metric

Release captured2026-07-18

Source data-throughNot carried per metric

Release captured identifies this public release; it does not claim that every upstream source was current through that date. Source names remain unavailable because they are not carried per metric in the public record. Percentiles describe position within the stated comparison context. Wonderkid Score inputs, weights and formula remain proprietary and are not disclosed here.

Market evidenceValuation history coverage · UnavailableValuation-history coverage is unavailable in this release. The separate model estimate remains available, but missing observations are not treated as zero.

Scout estimate

~€26m

€25–49m tier

Rounded Wonderkid Scout estimate · 2026-07-18

Likely-sale range

Not calibrated

Model-led only

Market evidence

No dated anchor

A range will appear only after player-specific evidence is reviewed.

This remains a model-led estimate informed by current football evidence and reviewed market comparables. No dated player-specific market or fee anchor is available in this release.

Valuation-history coverage is unavailable for this release. This does not mean the player had zero historical market observations.

Club-to-club transfer historyTransfer history coverage · ReadyTransfer-history coverage is ready with 2 reviewed records, newest first.

Jagiellonia U19Jagiellonia
2024-07-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported
Białystok YouthJagiellonia U19
2024-01-01 · Permanent · Fee not reported

Source: salimt/football-datasets (Transfermarkt-derived).

Recorded moves may not form a complete career chain. The current club shown above is reviewed separately.

Recent senior involvementRecent matches coverage · PartialRecent-match coverage is partial with 10 reviewed appearances; unavailable match context is omitted.

vs CD Santa Clara

2026-05-16 · Liga Portugal · Substitute

Peer-level opponent sample

34'

0G · 0A

vs Avs Futebol

2026-05-10 · Liga Portugal · Substitute

Lighter opponent sample

22'

0G · 0A

vs FC Alverca

2026-05-02 · Liga Portugal · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

63'

0G · 0A

vs CF Estrela Amadora

2026-04-26 · Liga Portugal · Started

Lighter opponent sample

90'

0G · 1A

vs CD Tondela

2026-04-19 · Liga Portugal · Started

Lighter opponent sample

70'

0G · 0A

vs GD Estoril Praia

2026-04-12 · Liga Portugal · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

60'

0G · 0A

vs FC Famalicão

2026-04-04 · Liga Portugal · Started

Stronger opponent sample

45'

0G · 0A

vs SC Braga

2026-03-22 · Liga Portugal · Started

Stronger opponent sample

78'

0G · 1A

vs Moreirense FC

2026-03-15 · Liga Portugal · Started

Peer-level opponent sample

56'

1G · 0A

vs SL Benfica

2026-03-08 · Liga Portugal · Started

Stronger opponent sample

64'

1G · 0A

Profile context and privacyPublic identity fields, release dates and age-protection boundaries.

Position group: Forward
Position: LW

Ages are shown only in whole years. Exact birth dates are not published for any player. Under-18 profiles do not display portraits, physical details, or detailed history.

How to read this profileHigh-level onlyInterpretation guidance and limitations without publishing proprietary calculation weights.

Wonderkid Score

A position-aware discovery score informed by performance, age, playing time and competition context. It prioritizes search and comparison; it is not a career prediction.

Percentiles and scout prompts

Percentiles compare current published role evidence. Low involvement is not automatically a weakness; tactics, opponent quality, sample size and video context still matter.

Versioned release

This score is bound to release global-top-250-2026-07-18. A public “what moved” explanation will appear only after a second comparable score, minutes and role snapshot exists.

Youth age context

Verified private cohort windows can be retained as coarse validation bands. The current release does not apply a relative-age score correction. Exact birth dates are never published, and unavailable context is never inferred.

Detailed model weights, internal provider identifiers and raw source payloads are not part of the public profile. Unavailable athletic-tracking, off-ball, contract and event-location evidence is omitted rather than estimated.

Coverage gapsNot scoredImportant scouting dimensions reserved for verified evidence rather than inferred from conventional event totals.

Athletic tracking

Top speed, acceleration, repeat sprinting and contact tolerance require consistent tracking or testing data.

Off-ball intelligence

Movement, scanning, space creation and pressure behaviour require observed location data or reviewed video.

Scout projection

Ceiling, tactical fit and development priorities require a verified human scouting report and longitudinal evidence.

Spatial evidence

Action maps require verified player-linked event coordinates. Territory, off-ball movement and physical maps require tracking data and are never estimated from totals.

Evidence grade

How much reviewed public evidence supports this profile—not a talent grade.

Moderate evidence

A meaningful reviewed sample with some coverage limits still visible.

Senior sample: 820 min
Role measures: 5
Requested role coverage: 18 measuresPartial

Snapshot 2026-07-18. Grade presentation follows the reviewed evidence state already attached to the profile.