WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#202LW

Wilson Odobert

Age 21 · Tottenham Hotspur · Premier League

Open profile
63.1
#163LW

Antonio Nusa

Age 21 · RB Leipzig · Bundesliga

Open profile
64.2

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Wilson Odobert63.1Antonio Nusa edgeAntonio Nusa64.2
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Wilson Odobert3 edgesWilson Odobert edgeAntonio Nusa2 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Wilson Odobert980Antonio Nusa edgeAntonio Nusa2,042
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · LW

Antonio Nusa holds the broader LW edge

4 meaningful role-shape advantages to 1. The largest separation is Duel strength.

8 shared dimensions
Duel strength38 pt edge
5189
Shot generation20 pt edge
4262
One-v-one threat9 pt edge
7786
Combination play8 pt edge
4856
Ball security8 pt edge
5850
Wilson OdobertAntonio Nusa
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Wilson Odobert and Antonio Nusa on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Wilson OdobertAntonio Nusa
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureWilson OdobertAntonio Nusa
Wonderkid Score63.1064.20
Board rank#202#163
Age2121
Estimated transfer worth~€25m~€80m
Valuation tier€25–49m€70–89m
Appearances2431
Starts1024
Senior minutes9802,042
Goals24
Assists24
PositionLeft WingerLeft Winger
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureWilson OdobertAntonio Nusa
xG per 900.23 /90 · 18th0.23 /90 · 11th
Non-penalty xG per 900.23 /90 · 18th0.23 /90 · 11th
xA per 900.19 /90 · 39th0.21 /90 · 54th
Shots2.02 /90 · 43rd2.69 /90 · 69th
Shots on target0.73 /90 · 41st0.88 /90 · 55th
Shot accuracy36.4% · 44th32.8% · 33rd
Big chances created0.28 /900.40 /90
Key passes1.84 /90 · 87th1.45 /90 · 72nd
Successful dribbles2.20 /90 · 80th3.00 /90 · 92nd
Dribble attempts3.77 /90 · 67th5.69 /90 · 92nd
Dribble success58.5% · 85th52.7% · 75th
Accurate crosses0.73 /900.62 /90
Crosses2.57 /90 · 68th2.91 /90 · 72nd
Cross accuracy28.6%21.2%
Ball security2.02 /90 · 21st1.81 /90 · 31st
xG chain per 900.57 /90 · 4th0.73 /90 · 39th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison