WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#181AM

Rodrigo Mora

Age 19 · AS Roma · Serie A

Stats: FC Porto · Liga Portugal · 2025/26

Open profile
63.7
#43AM

Rayan Cherki

Age 22 · Manchester City · Premier League

Open profile
71.2

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Rodrigo Mora63.7Rayan Cherki edgeRayan Cherki71.2
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Rodrigo Mora0 edgesRayan Cherki edgeRayan Cherki4 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Rodrigo Mora1,181Rayan Cherki edgeRayan Cherki1,785
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · AM

Rayan Cherki holds the broader AM edge

3 meaningful role-shape advantages to 1. The largest separation is Distribution.

6 shared dimensions
Distribution58 pt edge
4098
One-v-one threat11 pt edge
6980
Finishing threat10 pt edge
4353
Ball security7 pt edge
2619
Shot generationLevel
8185
Rodrigo MoraRayan Cherki
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Rodrigo Mora and Rayan Cherki on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Rodrigo MoraRayan Cherki
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureRodrigo MoraRayan Cherki
Wonderkid Score63.7071.20
Board rank#181#43
Age1922
Estimated transfer worth~€60m~€100m
Valuation tier€50–69m€100–149m
Appearances2833
Starts1419
Senior minutes1,1811,785
Goals14
Assists112
PositionAttacking MidfieldAttacking Midfield
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureRodrigo MoraRayan Cherki
Shots2.82 /90 · 94th2.77 /90 · 93rd
Shots on target0.61 /90 · 69th0.71 /90 · 77th
Shot accuracy21.6% · 17th25.5% · 30th
Big chances created0.46 /900.86 /90
Key passes2.74 /90 · 97th3.18 /90 · 99th
Successful dribbles1.68 /90 · 83rd2.57 /90 · 96th
Dribble attempts3.81 /90 · 87th5.34 /90 · 97th
Dribble success44.0% · 36th48.1% · 48th
Accurate crosses1.52 /901.21 /90
Crosses5.56 /90 · 96th4.03 /90 · 88th
Cross accuracy27.4%30.0%
Ball security1.60 /90 · 26th1.76 /90 · 19th
Fouls won0.76 /90 · 18th1.71 /90 · 67th
Passes31.93 /90 · 40th64.39 /90 · 99th
Completed passes25.38 /90 · 40th55.66 /90 · 98th
Long passes2.29 /90 · 42nd3.28 /90 · 66th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison