WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#43AM

Rayan Cherki

Age 22 · Manchester City · Premier League

Open profile
71.2
#181AM

Rodrigo Mora

Age 19 · AS Roma · Serie A

Stats: FC Porto · Liga Portugal · 2025/26

Open profile
63.7

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Rayan Cherki71.2Rayan Cherki edgeRodrigo Mora63.7
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Rayan Cherki4 edgesRayan Cherki edgeRodrigo Mora0 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Rayan Cherki1,785Rayan Cherki edgeRodrigo Mora1,181
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · AM

Rayan Cherki holds the broader AM edge

3 meaningful role-shape advantages to 1. The largest separation is Distribution.

6 shared dimensions
Distribution58 pt edge
9840
One-v-one threat11 pt edge
8069
Finishing threat10 pt edge
5343
Ball security7 pt edge
1926
Shot generationLevel
8581
Rayan CherkiRodrigo Mora
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Rayan Cherki and Rodrigo Mora on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Rayan CherkiRodrigo Mora
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureRayan CherkiRodrigo Mora
Wonderkid Score71.2063.70
Board rank#43#181
Age2219
Estimated transfer worth~€100m~€60m
Valuation tier€100–149m€50–69m
Appearances3328
Starts1914
Senior minutes1,7851,181
Goals41
Assists121
PositionAttacking MidfieldAttacking Midfield
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureRayan CherkiRodrigo Mora
Shots2.77 /90 · 93rd2.82 /90 · 94th
Shots on target0.71 /90 · 77th0.61 /90 · 69th
Shot accuracy25.5% · 30th21.6% · 17th
Big chances created0.86 /900.46 /90
Key passes3.18 /90 · 99th2.74 /90 · 97th
Successful dribbles2.57 /90 · 96th1.68 /90 · 83rd
Dribble attempts5.34 /90 · 97th3.81 /90 · 87th
Dribble success48.1% · 48th44.0% · 36th
Accurate crosses1.21 /901.52 /90
Crosses4.03 /90 · 88th5.56 /90 · 96th
Cross accuracy30.0%27.4%
Ball security1.76 /90 · 19th1.60 /90 · 26th
Fouls won1.71 /90 · 67th0.76 /90 · 18th
Passes64.39 /90 · 99th31.93 /90 · 40th
Completed passes55.66 /90 · 98th25.38 /90 · 40th
Long passes3.28 /90 · 66th2.29 /90 · 42nd
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison