WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#57RW

Prosper Obah

Age 22 · LNZ Cherkasy · Ukrainian Premier League

Open profile
70.3
#184RW

Lucas Ferreira

Age 20 · FC Shakhtar Donetsk · Ukrainian Premier League

Open profile
63.6

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Prosper Obah70.3Prosper Obah edgeLucas Ferreira63.6
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Prosper Obah2 edgesLucas Ferreira edgeLucas Ferreira3 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Prosper Obah1,589Prosper Obah edgeLucas Ferreira552
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · RW

Lucas Ferreira holds the broader RW edge

3 meaningful role-shape advantages to 2. The largest separation is Combination play.

8 shared dimensions
Combination play43 pt edge
3881
Finishing threat25 pt edge
7954
Chance creation13 pt edge
6073
Ball security11 pt edge
6071
Duel strength10 pt edge
7060
Prosper ObahLucas Ferreira
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Prosper Obah and Lucas Ferreira on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Prosper ObahLucas Ferreira
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureProsper ObahLucas Ferreira
Wonderkid Score70.3063.60
Board rank#57#184
Age2220
Estimated transfer worth~€4m~€9m
Valuation tierUnder €5m€5–9m
Appearances2616
Starts165
Senior minutes1,589552
Goals102
Assists31
PositionRight WingerRight Winger
Evidencestrongmoderate
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureProsper ObahLucas Ferreira
Shots2.38 /90 · 57th2.61 /90 · 66th
Shots on target1.19 /90 · 75th0.98 /90 · 62nd
Shot accuracy50.0% · 82nd37.5% · 47th
Big chances created0.23 /900.16 /90
Key passes1.25 /90 · 60th1.47 /90 · 73rd
Successful dribbles3.46 /90 · 96th3.42 /90 · 95th
Dribble attempts5.55 /90 · 91st4.24 /90 · 75th
Dribble success62.2% · 89th80.8% · 98th
Accurate crosses0.68 /901.47 /90
Crosses2.04 /90 · 58th2.12 /90 · 60th
Cross accuracy33.3%69.2%
Ball security0.96 /90 · 82nd1.30 /90 · 62nd
Fouls won1.59 /90 · 57th0.65 /90 · 9th
Passes19.54 /90 · 40th30.65 /90 · 85th
Completed passes14.27 /90 · 38th24.78 /90 · 86th
Pass accuracy73.0% · 38th80.9% · 81st
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison