WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#153AM

Omari Hutchinson

Age 22 · Nottingham Forest · Premier League

Open profile
64.5
#24AM

Nico Paz

Age 21 · Como 1907 · Serie A

Open profile
73.9

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Omari Hutchinson64.5Nico Paz edgeNico Paz73.9
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Omari Hutchinson2 edgesBalanced role shapeNico Paz2 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Omari Hutchinson1,682Nico Paz edgeNico Paz2,887
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · AM

Nico Paz holds the broader AM edge

4 meaningful role-shape advantages to 1. The largest separation is Distribution.

7 shared dimensions
Distribution45 pt edge
3176
Shot generation39 pt edge
6099
Finishing threat18 pt edge
6583
Ball security10 pt edge
2333
Chance creation9 pt edge
8677
Omari HutchinsonNico Paz
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Omari Hutchinson and Nico Paz on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Omari HutchinsonNico Paz
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureOmari HutchinsonNico Paz
Wonderkid Score64.5073.90
Board rank#153#24
Age2221
Estimated transfer worth~€40m~€80m
Valuation tier€25–49m€70–89m
Appearances3135
Starts1733
Senior minutes1,6822,887
Goals112
Assists56
PositionAttacking MidfieldAttacking Midfield
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureOmari HutchinsonNico Paz
xG per 900.12 /90 · 50th0.28 /90 · 86th
Non-penalty xG per 900.12 /90 · 50th0.23 /90 · 79th
xA per 900.27 /90 · 86th0.22 /90 · 76th
Shots1.34 /90 · 48th3.77 /90 · 99th
Shots on target0.64 /90 · 72nd1.50 /90 · 99th
Shot accuracy48.0% · 86th39.7% · 68th
Big chances created0.48 /900.37 /90
Key passes1.82 /90 · 87th1.59 /90 · 78th
Successful dribbles2.19 /90 · 92nd2.15 /90 · 91st
Dribble attempts4.28 /90 · 92nd3.90 /90 · 88th
Dribble success51.2% · 60th55.2% · 70th
Accurate crosses1.61 /900.44 /90
Crosses7.22 /90 · 99th1.96 /90 · 66th
Cross accuracy22.2%22.2%
Ball security1.66 /90 · 23rd1.47 /90 · 33rd
xG chain per 900.56 /90 · 40th0.61 /90 · 50th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison