WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#42CF

Mihajlo Cvetkovic

Age 19 · RSC Anderlecht · Belgian Pro League

Open profile
71.3
#243CF

Max Dean

Age 22 · KAA Gent · Belgian Pro League

Open profile
61.6

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Mihajlo Cvetkovic71.3Mihajlo Cvetkovic edgeMax Dean61.6
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Mihajlo Cvetkovic2 edgesMax Dean edgeMax Dean3 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Mihajlo Cvetkovic1,627Mihajlo Cvetkovic edgeMax Dean1,177
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CF

A split role verdict

Mihajlo Cvetkovic and Max Dean each hold 2 meaningful role-shape edges. The largest separation is Shot generation.

7 shared dimensions
Shot generation29 pt edge
6594
Chance creation23 pt edge
3962
Combination play8 pt edge
5042
One-v-one threat6 pt edge
1610
Aerial authorityLevel
5753
Mihajlo CvetkovicMax Dean
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Mihajlo Cvetkovic and Max Dean on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Mihajlo CvetkovicMax Dean
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureMihajlo CvetkovicMax Dean
Wonderkid Score71.3061.60
Board rank#42#243
Age1922
Estimated transfer worth~€10m~€2m
Valuation tier€10–24mUnder €5m
Appearances2923
Starts1911
Senior minutes1,6271,177
Goals97
Assists21
PositionCentre-ForwardCentre-Forward
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureMihajlo CvetkovicMax Dean
Shots2.32 /90 · 55th3.82 /90 · 94th
Shots on target1.22 /90 · 76th1.68 /90 · 93rd
Shot accuracy52.4% · 87th44.0% · 67th
Big chances created0.11 /900.31 /90
Key passes0.94 /90 · 39th1.30 /90 · 62nd
Successful dribbles0.44 /90 · 9th0.38 /90 · 6th
Dribble attempts1.16 /90 · 8th1.22 /90 · 9th
Dribble success38.1% · 29th31.2% · 15th
Crosses0.11 /90 · 3rd1.15 /90 · 41st
Ball security1.38 /90 · 58th0.84 /90 · 88th
Fouls won1.66 /90 · 61st1.45 /90 · 50th
Passes16.54 /90 · 23rd14.53 /90 · 14th
Completed passes12.45 /90 · 30th10.71 /90 · 20th
Pass accuracy75.3% · 50th73.7% · 42nd
Duels10.62 /90 · 24th8.56 /90 · 6th
Duels won4.04 /90 · 17th3.52 /90 · 9th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison