WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#243CF

Max Dean

Age 22 · KAA Gent · Belgian Pro League

Open profile
61.6
#42CF

Mihajlo Cvetkovic

Age 19 · RSC Anderlecht · Belgian Pro League

Open profile
71.3

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Max Dean61.6Mihajlo Cvetkovic edgeMihajlo Cvetkovic71.3
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Max Dean3 edgesMax Dean edgeMihajlo Cvetkovic2 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Max Dean1,177Mihajlo Cvetkovic edgeMihajlo Cvetkovic1,627
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CF

A split role verdict

Max Dean and Mihajlo Cvetkovic each hold 2 meaningful role-shape edges. The largest separation is Shot generation.

7 shared dimensions
Shot generation29 pt edge
9465
Chance creation23 pt edge
6239
Combination play8 pt edge
4250
One-v-one threat6 pt edge
1016
Aerial authorityLevel
5357
Max DeanMihajlo Cvetkovic
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Max Dean and Mihajlo Cvetkovic on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Max DeanMihajlo Cvetkovic
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureMax DeanMihajlo Cvetkovic
Wonderkid Score61.6071.30
Board rank#243#42
Age2219
Estimated transfer worth~€2m~€10m
Valuation tierUnder €5m€10–24m
Appearances2329
Starts1119
Senior minutes1,1771,627
Goals79
Assists12
PositionCentre-ForwardCentre-Forward
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureMax DeanMihajlo Cvetkovic
Shots3.82 /90 · 94th2.32 /90 · 55th
Shots on target1.68 /90 · 93rd1.22 /90 · 76th
Shot accuracy44.0% · 67th52.4% · 87th
Big chances created0.31 /900.11 /90
Key passes1.30 /90 · 62nd0.94 /90 · 39th
Successful dribbles0.38 /90 · 6th0.44 /90 · 9th
Dribble attempts1.22 /90 · 9th1.16 /90 · 8th
Dribble success31.2% · 15th38.1% · 29th
Crosses1.15 /90 · 41st0.11 /90 · 3rd
Ball security0.84 /90 · 88th1.38 /90 · 58th
Fouls won1.45 /90 · 50th1.66 /90 · 61st
Passes14.53 /90 · 14th16.54 /90 · 23rd
Completed passes10.71 /90 · 20th12.45 /90 · 30th
Pass accuracy73.7% · 42nd75.3% · 50th
Duels8.56 /90 · 6th10.62 /90 · 24th
Duels won3.52 /90 · 9th4.04 /90 · 17th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison