WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#74CB

Matte Smets

Age 22 · KRC Genk · Belgian Pro League

Open profile
69.4
#56CB

Marvin Young

Age 20 · Sparta Rotterdam · Eredivisie

Open profile
70.3

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Matte Smets69.4Marvin Young edgeMarvin Young70.3
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Matte Smets2 edgesMatte Smets edgeMarvin Young1 edge
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Matte Smets3,510Matte Smets edgeMarvin Young2,970
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CB

Matte Smets holds the broader CB edge

5 meaningful role-shape advantages to 2. The largest separation is Distribution.

7 shared dimensions
Distribution26 pt edge
9468
Long distribution18 pt edge
9577
Ball security17 pt edge
9073
Box defending8 pt edge
7163
Defensive activity8 pt edge
6371
Matte SmetsMarvin Young
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Matte Smets and Marvin Young on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.PassingLong passingDuels wonTacklesinterception_volumeClearances
Matte SmetsMarvin Young
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureMatte SmetsMarvin Young
Wonderkid Score69.4070.30
Board rank#74#56
Age2220
Estimated transfer worth~€10m~€6m
Valuation tier€10–24m€5–9m
Appearances3933
Starts3933
Senior minutes3,5102,970
Goals10
Assists11
PositionCentre-BackCentre-Back
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureMatte SmetsMarvin Young
Passes74.97 /90 · 96th53.64 /90 · 65th
Pass accuracy91.4% · 90th89.1% · 73rd
Long passes9.95 /90 · 95th6.45 /90 · 62nd
Accurate long passes5.90 /90 · 98th3.67 /90 · 81st
Long-pass accuracy59.3% · 93rd56.8% · 88th
Duels7.31 /90 · 33rd8.00 /90 · 46th
Duels won4.28 /90 · 38th4.67 /90 · 53rd
Duel win rate58.6% · 57th58.3% · 56th
Aerial wins1.90 /90 · 43rd1.76 /90 · 36th
Interceptions1.44 /90 · 69th1.70 /90 · 82nd
Clearances7.00 /90 · 87th6.24 /90 · 75th
Defensive shot blocks0.79 /90 · 55th0.76 /90 · 51st
1v1 containment0.33 /900.58 /90
Tackles1.79 /90 · 64th2.18 /90 · 81st
Discipline0.56 /90 · 88th1.12 /90 · 43rd
Completed passes68.54 /90 · 96th47.79 /90 · 67th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison