WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#158CM

Mathias de Amorim

Age 21 · FC Famalicão · Liga Portugal

Open profile
64.3
#131CM

Amorim

Age 21 · Genoa CFC · Serie A

Stats: FC Alverca · Liga Portugal · 2025/26

Open profile
65.3

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Mathias de Amorim64.3Amorim edgeAmorim65.3
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Mathias de Amorim1 edgeAmorim edgeAmorim3 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Mathias de Amorim2,470Mathias de Amorim edgeAmorim1,634
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CM

Mathias de Amorim holds the broader CM edge

3 meaningful role-shape advantages to 2. The largest separation is Duel strength.

6 shared dimensions
Duel strength27 pt edge
9467
Distribution19 pt edge
3958
Defensive activity14 pt edge
7662
Chance creation10 pt edge
3727
Long distribution5 pt edge
5863
Mathias de AmorimAmorim
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Mathias de Amorim and Amorim on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Mathias de AmorimAmorim
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureMathias de AmorimAmorim
Wonderkid Score64.3065.30
Board rank#158#131
Age2121
Estimated transfer worth~€10m~€3m
Valuation tier€10–24mUnder €5m
Appearances3019
Starts3019
Senior minutes2,4701,634
Goals42
Assists20
PositionCentral MidfieldCentral Midfield
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureMathias de AmorimAmorim
Key passes0.91 /90 · 37th0.77 /90 · 27th
Big chances created0.18 /900.22 /90
Passes31.04 /90 · 36th37.40 /90 · 57th
Long passes1.89 /90 · 30th3.47 /90 · 71st
Long-pass accuracy73.1% · 94th52.4% · 47th
Ball security1.24 /90 · 47th1.16 /90 · 51st
Dribble attempts2.81 /90 · 75th1.49 /90 · 31st
Successful dribbles1.49 /90 · 78th0.99 /90 · 54th
Dribble success53.2% · 64th66.7% · 91st
Duels14.76 /90 · 88th10.69 /90 · 44th
Duels won7.91 /90 · 94th5.84 /90 · 67th
Interceptions0.98 /90 · 63rd0.77 /90 · 44th
Tackles3.02 /90 · 88th2.59 /90 · 80th
Aerial wins0.66 /90 · 39th0.33 /90 · 13th
Accurate crosses0.18 /900.22 /90
Cross accuracy19.2%26.7%
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison