WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#69CM

Mateus Fernandes

Age 22 · Tottenham Hotspur · Premier League

Open profile
69.6
#70CM

Kodai Sano

Age 22 · PSV Eindhoven · Eredivisie

Stats: NEC Nijmegen · Eredivisie · 2025/26

Open profile
69.6

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Mateus Fernandes69.6No clear edgeKodai Sano69.6
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Mateus Fernandes3 edgesMateus Fernandes edgeKodai Sano2 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Mateus Fernandes3,028No clear edgeKodai Sano3,060
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CM

Mateus Fernandes holds the broader CM edge

2 meaningful role-shape advantages to 1. The largest separation is Ball security.

6 shared dimensions
Ball security28 pt edge
6234
Long distribution24 pt edge
8864
Chance creation21 pt edge
5172
Defensive activityLevel
7774
Duel strengthLevel
7072
Mateus FernandesKodai Sano
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Mateus Fernandes and Kodai Sano on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Mateus FernandesKodai Sano
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureMateus FernandesKodai Sano
Wonderkid Score69.6069.60
Board rank#69#70
Age2222
Estimated transfer worth~€50m~€12m
Valuation tier€50–69m€10–24m
Appearances3634
Starts3534
Senior minutes3,0283,060
Goals33
Assists48
PositionCentral MidfieldCentral Midfield
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureMateus FernandesKodai Sano
Key passes1.10 /90 · 51st1.44 /90 · 72nd
Big chances created0.09 /900.29 /90
Passes46.43 /90 · 82nd47.82 /90 · 85th
Long passes5.32 /90 · 94th4.09 /90 · 83rd
Long-pass accuracy61.5% · 74th48.2% · 35th
Ball security1.01 /90 · 62nd1.44 /90 · 34th
Dribble attempts1.46 /90 · 29th3.21 /90 · 82nd
Successful dribbles0.86 /90 · 44th1.79 /90 · 85th
Dribble success59.2% · 78th56.0% · 72nd
Duels10.67 /90 · 44th12.09 /90 · 63rd
Duels won5.91 /90 · 70th6.03 /90 · 72nd
Interceptions1.04 /90 · 65th1.41 /90 · 86th
Tackles3.06 /90 · 89th2.15 /90 · 62nd
Aerial wins0.56 /90 · 33rd1.15 /90 · 72nd
Accurate crosses0.36 /900.59 /90
Cross accuracy23.1%27.8%
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison