WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#170LB

Mateo Chávez

Age 22 · AZ Alkmaar · Eredivisie

Open profile
64.1
#88LB

Valy Konaté

Age 19 · Cercle Brugge · Belgian Pro League

Stats: Cercle Brugge · Belgian Pro League · 2025/26

Open profile
68.0

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Mateo Chávez64.1Valy Konaté edgeValy Konaté68.0
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Mateo Chávez1 edgeBalanced role shapeValy Konaté1 edge
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Mateo Chávez827No clear edgeValy Konaté822
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · LB

Valy Konaté holds the broader LB edge

5 meaningful role-shape advantages to 1. The largest separation is Combination play.

7 shared dimensions
Combination play27 pt edge
2148
One-v-one threat20 pt edge
6141
Ball security13 pt edge
3447
Wide delivery8 pt edge
3947
Defensive activity6 pt edge
9298
Mateo ChávezValy Konaté
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Mateo Chávez and Valy Konaté on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.Key passesPassingDuels wonTacklesinterception_volumeClearances
Mateo ChávezValy Konaté
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureMateo ChávezValy Konaté
Wonderkid Score64.1068
Board rank#170#88
Age2219
Estimated transfer worth~€2m~€4m
Valuation tierUnder €5mUnder €5m
Appearances2013
Starts99
Senior minutes827822
Goals10
Assists20
PositionLeft-BackLeft-Back
Evidencemoderatemoderate
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureMateo ChávezValy Konaté
Passes45.71 /90 · 82nd41.50 /90 · 74th
Pass accuracy74.0% · 21st79.4% · 48th
Long passes4.68 /90 · 71st5.15 /90 · 81st
Long-pass accuracy41.9% · 54th34.0% · 31st
Accurate crosses0.44 /90 · 37th0.55 /90 · 49th
Crosses2.50 /90 · 57th3.28 /90 · 70th
Cross accuracy17.4% · 24th16.7% · 21st
Dribble attempts1.96 /90 · 66th1.53 /90 · 50th
Successful dribbles0.98 /90 · 65th0.66 /90 · 42nd
Dribble success50.0% · 51st42.9% · 31st
Ball security0.76 /90 · 47th0.77 /90 · 47th
Tackles6.20 /90 · 100th4.60 /90 · 99th
Interceptions1.63 /90 · 84th2.19 /90 · 98th
Duel win rate61.3% · 91st63.7% · 95th
Aerial wins1.31 /90 · 74th2.41 /90 · 96th
1v1 containment2.39 /90 · 2nd1.09 /90 · 24th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison