WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#70CM

Kodai Sano

Age 22 · PSV Eindhoven · Eredivisie

Stats: NEC Nijmegen · Eredivisie · 2025/26

Open profile
69.6
#69CM

Mateus Fernandes

Age 22 · Tottenham Hotspur · Premier League

Open profile
69.6

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Kodai Sano69.6No clear edgeMateus Fernandes69.6
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Kodai Sano2 edgesMateus Fernandes edgeMateus Fernandes3 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Kodai Sano3,060No clear edgeMateus Fernandes3,028
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CM

Mateus Fernandes holds the broader CM edge

2 meaningful role-shape advantages to 1. The largest separation is Ball security.

6 shared dimensions
Ball security28 pt edge
3462
Long distribution24 pt edge
6488
Chance creation21 pt edge
7251
Defensive activityLevel
7477
Duel strengthLevel
7270
Kodai SanoMateus Fernandes
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Kodai Sano and Mateus Fernandes on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Kodai SanoMateus Fernandes
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureKodai SanoMateus Fernandes
Wonderkid Score69.6069.60
Board rank#70#69
Age2222
Estimated transfer worth~€12m~€50m
Valuation tier€10–24m€50–69m
Appearances3436
Starts3435
Senior minutes3,0603,028
Goals33
Assists84
PositionCentral MidfieldCentral Midfield
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureKodai SanoMateus Fernandes
Key passes1.44 /90 · 72nd1.10 /90 · 51st
Big chances created0.29 /900.09 /90
Passes47.82 /90 · 85th46.43 /90 · 82nd
Long passes4.09 /90 · 83rd5.32 /90 · 94th
Long-pass accuracy48.2% · 35th61.5% · 74th
Ball security1.44 /90 · 34th1.01 /90 · 62nd
Dribble attempts3.21 /90 · 82nd1.46 /90 · 29th
Successful dribbles1.79 /90 · 85th0.86 /90 · 44th
Dribble success56.0% · 72nd59.2% · 78th
Duels12.09 /90 · 63rd10.67 /90 · 44th
Duels won6.03 /90 · 72nd5.91 /90 · 70th
Interceptions1.41 /90 · 86th1.04 /90 · 65th
Tackles2.15 /90 · 62nd3.06 /90 · 89th
Aerial wins1.15 /90 · 72nd0.56 /90 · 33rd
Accurate crosses0.59 /900.36 /90
Cross accuracy27.8%23.1%
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison