WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#176CM

Kobbie Mainoo

Age 21 · Manchester United · Premier League

Open profile
63.9
#30CM

Lewis Miley

Age 20 · Newcastle United · Premier League

Open profile
73.2

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Kobbie Mainoo63.9Lewis Miley edgeLewis Miley73.2
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Kobbie Mainoo1 edgeLewis Miley edgeLewis Miley3 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Kobbie Mainoo1,653Kobbie Mainoo edgeLewis Miley1,492
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CM

Lewis Miley holds the broader CM edge

3 meaningful role-shape advantages to 2. The largest separation is Ball security.

7 shared dimensions
Ball security69 pt edge
2190
Combination play29 pt edge
6132
Duel strength9 pt edge
4554
Long distribution8 pt edge
4654
Distribution6 pt edge
9589
Kobbie MainooLewis Miley
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Kobbie Mainoo and Lewis Miley on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Kobbie MainooLewis Miley
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureKobbie MainooLewis Miley
Wonderkid Score63.9073.20
Board rank#176#30
Age2120
Estimated transfer worth~€70m~€60m
Valuation tier€70–89m€50–69m
Appearances2823
Starts1615
Senior minutes1,6531,492
Goals11
Assists24
PositionCentral MidfieldCentral Midfield
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureKobbie MainooLewis Miley
xA per 900.07 /90 · 8th0.14 /90 · 37th
Key passes1.31 /90 · 64th0.90 /90 · 36th
Big chances created0.11 /900.18 /90
Passes57.01 /90 · 94th50.67 /90 · 88th
Long passes2.12 /90 · 36th2.11 /90 · 35th
Long-pass accuracy56.4% · 59th62.9% · 78th
Ball security1.69 /90 · 21st0.54 /90 · 90th
Dribble attempts1.91 /90 · 47th0.97 /90 · 10th
Successful dribbles1.03 /90 · 56th0.72 /90 · 33rd
Dribble success54.3% · 67th75.0% · 96th
Duels10.13 /90 · 34th8.08 /90 · 10th
Duels won5.01 /90 · 45th5.37 /90 · 54th
Interceptions1.09 /90 · 70th1.21 /90 · 78th
Tackles1.96 /90 · 53rd1.75 /90 · 42nd
Aerial wins0.82 /90 · 54th2.71 /90 · 98th
Accurate crosses0.22 /900.36 /90
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison