WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#248LB

Juho Lähteenmäki

Age 20 · FC Nordsjaelland · Danish Superliga

Open profile
61.5
#152LB

Mats Rots

Age 20 · TSG Hoffenheim · Bundesliga

Stats: FC Twente · Eredivisie · 2025/26

Open profile
64.5

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Juho Lähteenmäki61.5Mats Rots edgeMats Rots64.5
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Juho Lähteenmäki2 edgesMats Rots edgeMats Rots3 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Juho Lähteenmäki2,214Mats Rots edgeMats Rots2,954
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · LB

Mats Rots holds the broader LB edge

4 meaningful role-shape advantages to 3. The largest separation is Combination play.

7 shared dimensions
Combination play31 pt edge
8150
Defensive activity20 pt edge
3959
Wide delivery15 pt edge
3146
Ball security14 pt edge
5339
Distribution12 pt edge
8068
Juho LähteenmäkiMats Rots
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Juho Lähteenmäki and Mats Rots on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.Key passesPassingDuels wonTacklesinterception_volumeClearances
Juho LähteenmäkiMats Rots
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureJuho LähteenmäkiMats Rots
Wonderkid Score61.5064.50
Board rank#248#152
Age2020
Estimated transfer worth~€2m~€12m
Valuation tierUnder €5m€10–24m
Appearances2734
Starts2634
Senior minutes2,2142,954
Goals24
Assists24
PositionLeft-BackLeft-Back
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureJuho LähteenmäkiMats Rots
Passes43.78 /90 · 78th43.51 /90 · 77th
Pass accuracy84.9% · 81st79.6% · 50th
Long passes2.28 /90 · 15th5.64 /90 · 86th
Long-pass accuracy50.0% · 77th40.5% · 48th
Accurate crosses0.24 /90 · 13th0.52 /90 · 46th
Crosses0.81 /90 · 6th2.53 /90 · 57th
Cross accuracy30.0% · 75th20.5% · 35th
Dribble attempts1.38 /90 · 44th2.83 /90 · 87th
Successful dribbles0.73 /90 · 49th1.07 /90 · 69th
Dribble success52.9% · 61st37.6% · 21st
Ball security1.02 /90 · 25th0.97 /90 · 27th
Tackles1.83 /90 · 36th2.29 /90 · 57th
Interceptions1.02 /90 · 41st1.22 /90 · 62nd
Duel win rate49.2% · 37th46.3% · 26th
Aerial wins0.20 /90 · 3rd0.55 /90 · 18th
1v1 containment0.65 /90 · 64th1.13 /90 · 23rd
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison