WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#28LW

Joseph Opoku

Age 20 · Swansea City · Championship

Stats: Zulte Waregem · Belgian Pro League · 2025/26

Open profile
73.2
#83LW

Ben Broggio

Age 19 · Falkirk FC · Scottish Premiership

Open profile
68.3

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Joseph Opoku73.2Joseph Opoku edgeBen Broggio68.3
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Joseph Opoku1 edgeBen Broggio edgeBen Broggio3 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Joseph Opoku2,383Joseph Opoku edgeBen Broggio944
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · LW

A split role verdict

Joseph Opoku and Ben Broggio each hold 3 meaningful role-shape edges. The largest separation is Shot generation.

8 shared dimensions
Shot generation37 pt edge
5821
Duel strength29 pt edge
938
Combination play20 pt edge
6747
Wide delivery17 pt edge
3956
Ball security14 pt edge
5165
Joseph OpokuBen Broggio
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Joseph Opoku and Ben Broggio on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Joseph OpokuBen Broggio
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureJoseph OpokuBen Broggio
Wonderkid Score73.2068.30
Board rank#28#83
Age2019
Estimated transfer worth~€8m~€4m
Valuation tier€5–9mUnder €5m
Appearances3214
Starts2912
Senior minutes2,383944
Goals105
Assists72
PositionLeft WingerLeft Winger
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureJoseph OpokuBen Broggio
Shots2.53 /90 · 63rd1.43 /90 · 16th
Shots on target0.87 /90 · 53rd0.57 /90 · 26th
Shot accuracy34.3% · 40th40.0% · 56th
Big chances created0.34 /900.48 /90
Key passes1.70 /90 · 82nd1.72 /90 · 82nd
Successful dribbles1.36 /90 · 56th1.05 /90 · 42nd
Dribble attempts2.98 /90 · 53rd1.91 /90 · 28th
Dribble success45.6% · 54th55.0% · 80th
Accurate crosses0.23 /900.48 /90
Crosses1.10 /90 · 39th1.91 /90 · 56th
Cross accuracy20.7%25.0%
Ball security1.74 /90 · 35th0.95 /90 · 83rd
Fouls won1.02 /90 · 25th1.05 /90 · 27th
Passes22.02 /90 · 53rd27.74 /90 · 77th
Completed passes17.30 /90 · 58th20.78 /90 · 74th
Pass accuracy78.6% · 67th74.9% · 47th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison