WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#20AM

Ibrahim Maza

Age 20 · Bayer 04 Leverkusen · Bundesliga

Open profile
74.4
#61AM

Rayane Bounida

Age 20 · Ajax Amsterdam · Eredivisie

Open profile
70.0

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Ibrahim Maza74.4Ibrahim Maza edgeRayane Bounida70.0
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Ibrahim Maza1 edgeRayane Bounida edgeRayane Bounida2 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Ibrahim Maza1,852Ibrahim Maza edgeRayane Bounida828
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · AM

A split role verdict

Ibrahim Maza and Rayane Bounida each hold 2 meaningful role-shape edges. The largest separation is Chance creation.

6 shared dimensions
Chance creation29 pt edge
71100
Ball security23 pt edge
5431
Shot generation10 pt edge
8797
One-v-one threat5 pt edge
8681
Finishing threatLevel
6564
Ibrahim MazaRayane Bounida
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Ibrahim Maza and Rayane Bounida on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Ibrahim MazaRayane Bounida
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureIbrahim MazaRayane Bounida
Wonderkid Score74.4070
Board rank#20#61
Age2020
Estimated transfer worth~€85m~€2m
Valuation tier€70–89mUnder €5m
Appearances2822
Starts209
Senior minutes1,852828
Goals31
Assists45
PositionAttacking MidfieldAttacking Midfield
Evidencestrongmoderate
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureIbrahim MazaRayane Bounida
Shots2.62 /90 · 90th4.02 /90 · 100th
Shots on target0.83 /90 · 84th1.09 /90 · 93rd
Shot accuracy31.5% · 46th27.0% · 35th
Big chances created0.44 /900.54 /90
Key passes1.41 /90 · 71st3.48 /90 · 100th
Successful dribbles2.33 /90 · 93rd1.96 /90 · 88th
Dribble attempts4.13 /90 · 91st3.48 /90 · 84th
Dribble success56.5% · 73rd56.2% · 72nd
Accurate crosses0.68 /901.41 /90
Crosses3.11 /90 · 82nd6.52 /90 · 98th
Cross accuracy21.9%21.7%
Ball security1.12 /90 · 54th1.52 /90 · 31st
Fouls won1.75 /90 · 69th2.39 /90 · 86th
Passes43.30 /90 · 76th43.04 /90 · 75th
Completed passes35.96 /90 · 75th35.76 /90 · 75th
Long passes1.94 /90 · 31st3.37 /90 · 69th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison