WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#236CM

Dirk Asare

Age 22 · Zulte Waregem · Belgian Pro League

Open profile
61.7
#69CM

Mateus Fernandes

Age 22 · Tottenham Hotspur · Premier League

Open profile
69.6

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Dirk Asare61.7Mateus Fernandes edgeMateus Fernandes69.6
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Dirk Asare2 edgesBalanced role shapeMateus Fernandes2 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Dirk Asare818Mateus Fernandes edgeMateus Fernandes3,028
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CM

Mateus Fernandes holds the broader CM edge

4 meaningful role-shape advantages to 2. The largest separation is Chance creation.

6 shared dimensions
Chance creation35 pt edge
1651
Ball security17 pt edge
7962
Duel strength15 pt edge
5570
Long distribution15 pt edge
7388
Distribution6 pt edge
7783
Dirk AsareMateus Fernandes
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Dirk Asare and Mateus Fernandes on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.ShotsShot accuracyKey passesDribble successBig chancesPassing
Dirk AsareMateus Fernandes
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureDirk AsareMateus Fernandes
Wonderkid Score61.7069.60
Board rank#236#69
Age2222
Estimated transfer worth~€1m~€50m
Valuation tierUnder €5m€50–69m
Appearances1136
Starts935
Senior minutes8183,028
Goals03
Assists04
PositionCentral MidfieldCentral Midfield
Evidencemoderatestrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureDirk AsareMateus Fernandes
Key passes0.55 /90 · 16th1.10 /90 · 51st
Big chances created0.33 /900.09 /90
Passes43.13 /90 · 76th46.43 /90 · 82nd
Long passes3.63 /90 · 75th5.32 /90 · 94th
Long-pass accuracy57.6% · 65th61.5% · 74th
Ball security0.77 /90 · 79th1.01 /90 · 62nd
Dribble attempts1.21 /90 · 19th1.46 /90 · 29th
Successful dribbles0.77 /90 · 36th0.86 /90 · 44th
Dribble success63.6% · 86th59.2% · 78th
Duels9.90 /90 · 30th10.67 /90 · 44th
Duels won5.39 /90 · 55th5.91 /90 · 70th
Interceptions1.65 /90 · 91st1.04 /90 · 65th
Tackles2.42 /90 · 74th3.06 /90 · 89th
Aerial wins1.32 /90 · 79th0.56 /90 · 33rd
Accurate crosses0.11 /900.36 /90
Cross accuracy25.0%23.1%
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison