WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#29RB

Davis Opoku

Age 18 · Oud-Heverlee Leuven · Belgian Pro League

Open profile
73.2
#174RB

Boris Matic

Age 21 · Wolfsberger AC · Austrian Bundesliga

Open profile
64.0

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Davis Opoku73.2Davis Opoku edgeBoris Matic64.0
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Davis Opoku4 edgesDavis Opoku edgeBoris Matic0 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Davis Opoku812Boris Matic edgeBoris Matic1,846
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · RB

Davis Opoku holds the broader RB edge

4 meaningful role-shape advantages to 1. The largest separation is Combination play.

7 shared dimensions
Combination play40 pt edge
5818
Defensive activity19 pt edge
9273
Duel strength19 pt edge
8263
Wide delivery12 pt edge
7486
One-v-one threat9 pt edge
6960
Davis OpokuBoris Matic
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Davis Opoku and Boris Matic on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.Key passesPassingDuels wonTacklesinterception_volumeClearances
Davis OpokuBoris Matic
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureDavis OpokuBoris Matic
Wonderkid Score73.2064
Board rank#29#174
Age1821
Estimated transfer worth~€6m~€2m
Valuation tier€5–9mUnder €5m
Appearances2125
Starts521
Senior minutes8121,846
Goals01
Assists25
PositionRight-BackRight-Back
Evidencemoderatestrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureDavis OpokuBoris Matic
Passes28.82 /90 · 25th35.74 /90 · 51st
Pass accuracy80.8% · 58th72.7% · 18th
Long passes3.21 /90 · 37th3.80 /90 · 51st
Long-pass accuracy37.9% · 42nd55.1% · 86th
Accurate crosses0.89 /90 · 79th1.41 /90 · 92nd
Crosses2.33 /90 · 52nd4.44 /90 · 87th
Cross accuracy38.1% · 92nd31.9% · 79th
Dribble attempts1.88 /90 · 64th1.95 /90 · 65th
Successful dribbles1.11 /90 · 73rd0.98 /90 · 65th
Dribble success58.8% · 72nd50.0% · 51st
Ball security1.11 /90 · 20th0.63 /90 · 61st
Tackles3.66 /90 · 93rd2.83 /90 · 78th
Interceptions1.77 /90 · 92nd1.32 /90 · 69th
Duel win rate56.0% · 72nd51.7% · 51st
Aerial wins0.67 /90 · 28th1.17 /90 · 66th
1v1 containment1.33 /90 · 14th2.00 /90 · 4th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison