WSWonderkid Scout
Player comparison

Compare the signal on one scale.

Select two verified players to compare published football metrics, senior opportunity, and data confidence side by side.

Player A

Player B

Comparison ready
#232CB

Ayden Heaven

Age 19 · Manchester United · Premier League

Open profile
61.7
#81CB

Jaydee Canvot

Age 19 · Crystal Palace · Premier League

Open profile
68.5

Head-to-head snapshot

Immediate directional edges before the full visual comparison.

Not a final verdict
Model signal
Ayden Heaven61.7Jaydee Canvot edgeJaydee Canvot68.5
Current proprietary board signal on the same 0–100 scale.
Role-shape edge
Ayden Heaven2 edgesJaydee Canvot edgeJaydee Canvot3 edges
5 shared published role measures; a five-point gap marks a clear edge.
Senior exposure
Ayden Heaven924Jaydee Canvot edgeJaydee Canvot1,333
Verified senior minutes in the current release snapshot.

Role-aware verdict · CB

Jaydee Canvot holds the broader CB edge

3 meaningful role-shape advantages to 2. The largest separation is Aerial authority.

7 shared dimensions
Aerial authority29 pt edge
4271
Ball security17 pt edge
8467
Long distribution13 pt edge
3750
Duel strength8 pt edge
8173
Defensive activity6 pt edge
5460
Ayden HeavenJaydee Canvot
Performance percentile shape
Shared reviewed role-cohort measures on a consistent percentile scale. Internal score construction remains private.
Football percentile comparisonRadar chart comparing Ayden Heaven and Jaydee Canvot on their shared published football metrics, independently of the proprietary Wonderkid Score model.PassingLong passingDuels wonTacklesinterception_volumeClearances
Ayden HeavenJaydee Canvot
Senior record
Club output and profile context in the current release snapshot.
MeasureAyden HeavenJaydee Canvot
Wonderkid Score61.7068.50
Board rank#232#81
Age1919
Estimated transfer worth~€30m~€28m
Valuation tier€25–49m€25–49m
Appearances1720
Starts1114
Senior minutes9241,333
Goals00
Assists10
PositionCentre-BackCentre-Back
Evidencestrongstrong
Shared advanced metrics
Display values with role-percentile context where available.
MeasureAyden HeavenJaydee Canvot
Passes48.12 /90 · 46th51.65 /90 · 58th
Pass accuracy90.5% · 84th88.2% · 67th
Long passes2.92 /90 · 7th5.13 /90 · 38th
Accurate long passes1.66 /90 · 17th2.50 /90 · 50th
Long-pass accuracy56.7% · 87th48.7% · 63rd
Duels7.79 /90 · 43rd9.52 /90 · 72nd
Duels won5.36 /90 · 68th5.74 /90 · 78th
Duel win rate68.8% · 94th60.3% · 69th
Aerial wins1.85 /90 · 42nd2.50 /90 · 71st
Interceptions0.10 /90 · 0th0.81 /90 · 18th
Clearances5.84 /90 · 66th6.95 /90 · 86th
Defensive shot blocks1.07 /90 · 83rd0.95 /90 · 71st
1v1 containment0.49 /901.22 /90
Tackles2.14 /90 · 79th2.63 /90 · 90th
Discipline0.68 /90 · 78th0.81 /90 · 70th
Completed passes43.54 /90 · 53rd45.57 /90 · 60th
Research Desk comparisons

Featured head-to-head scouting reads

Open a focused comparison with a defined scouting question, role-aware evidence and direct links to both complete profiles.

Curated comparison

Lamine Yamal vs Estêvão: winger scouting comparison

Compare Lamine Yamal and Estêvão across chance creation, dribbling, xG, xA, senior minutes and role-adjusted winger percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Arda Güler vs Nico Paz: attacking-midfield comparison

Compare Arda Güler and Nico Paz across creation, shooting, xG, xA, ball security, senior minutes and attacking-midfield role percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Pau Cubarsí vs Jon Martín: centre-back comparison

Compare Pau Cubarsí and Jon Martín across distribution, duels, aerials, interceptions, clearances, senior minutes and centre-back percentiles.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Ayyoub Bouaddi vs Marc Bernal: midfield comparison

Compare Ayyoub Bouaddi and Marc Bernal across passing, carrying proxies, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and role-adjusted midfield evidence.

Open comparison

Curated comparison

Warren Zaïre-Emery vs João Neves: midfield comparison

Compare Warren Zaïre-Emery and João Neves across passing, creation, duels, defensive activity, senior minutes and central-midfield percentiles.

Open comparison